ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2020
Molecular analysis of circulating tumor DNA from breast cancer patients before and after surgery and following adjuvant chemotherapy.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell-free tumor DNA analysis in advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients: mutation frequencies, testing intention, and clinical impact.Precision clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Molecular profiles and circulating tumor-DNA detected in Chinese early stage breast cancer.Gland surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary aim of the present study is to provide a complex molecular profile of tumors using liquid biopsy and to monitor profile changes over time in association with surgery and administered adjuvant therapy. Our secondary aim was to compare the liquid biopsy profile with the tissue biopsy and assess concordance. A total of 27 samples of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) collected from 9 breast cancer patients at three different time points and their matched formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of primary tumor were analyzed with targeted next-generation sequencing. Somatic pathogenic variants were detected before surgery in samples from 5 patients (55.6%). The most frequently mutated genes were phosphatase and tensin homolog (4/9, 44.4%) and tumor protein 53 (4/9, 44.4%). Serial sampling of ctDNA enabled the detection of more variants compared with single-time tissue primary tumor biopsy. There were 17 ctDNA variants across all samples, but only 6 FFPE variants across all patients. In addition, the concordance between ctDNA and FFPE DNA was determined in only 1 patient, and this was connected with higher variant allele frequency. The findings of the present study suggest that liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy may be used as complementary analyses to adequately capture all tumor variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.