Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32765739›Full record

ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2020

Use of prokinetics and other quality factors in capsule endoscopy - old and new insights (Review).

Raluca Simona Costache, Alexandra Ioana Lulache, Mariana Jinga, Cătălina Vlăduț, Daniel Octavian Costache, Florentina Ioniță Radu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raluca Simona CostacheDepartment of Gastroenterology, 'Carol Davila' Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandra Ioana LulacheDepartment of Gastroenterology, 'Carol Davila' Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania.
Mariana JingaDepartment of Gastroenterology, 'Carol Davila' Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania.
Cătălina VlăduțDepartment of Gastroenterology, 'Prof. Dr. Agrippa Ionescu' Clinical Emergency Hospital, 011356 Bucharest, Romania.
Daniel Octavian CostacheDepartment of Research, 'Carol Davila' Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania.
Florentina Ioniță RaduDepartment of Gastroenterology, 'Carol Davila' Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the extensive recent development of different techniques for endoscopic evaluation for both diagnostic and therapeutic reasons, the small bowel remains quite difficult to visualize. Capsule endoscopy and device assisted enteroscopy are presently considered the best diagnostic tools for examination of small bowel disorders, assessing diverse pathologies such as obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, iron deficiency anemia, Crohn disease, small bowel tumors and polyposis syndromes. Like any other imagistic method, it has specific indications, and contraindications, and possibly it is more important to consider limitations. In order to obtain a better result, it is necessary to respect the procedural quality indicators. Among them the use of prokinetics - diverse pharmacological substances increasing the success rate of capsule endoscopy have raised debates. Capsule endoscopy small bowel evaluation is a reliable, non-invasive and safe with many advantages and minimum risks, with a proper selection of patients, and can be used as first line investigation.

Indexed as

anemiacapsule endoscopydomperidoneprokineticssmall bowel

Identifiers

PMID32765739
PMCPMC7401576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.