Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32765500›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2020

Establishing Simultaneous T Cell Receptor Excision Circles (TREC) and K-Deleting Recombination Excision Circles (KREC) Quantification Assays and Laboratory Reference Intervals in Healthy Individuals of Different Age Groups in Hong Kong.

Janette S Y Kwok, Stephen K F Cheung, Jenny C Y Ho, Ivan W H Tang, Patrick W K Chu, Eric Y S Leung, Pamela P W Lee, Daniel K L Cheuk, Vincent Lee, Patrick Ip and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Janette S Y KwokDivision of Transplantation and Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Stephen K F CheungDivision of Transplantation and Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Jenny C Y HoDivision of Transplantation and Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Ivan W H TangDivision of Transplantation and Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Patrick W K ChuDivision of Transplantation and Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Eric Y S LeungDivision of Transplantation and Immunogenetics, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Pamela P W LeeDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Daniel K L CheukDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Vincent LeeDepartment of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Patrick IpDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Y L LauDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Queen Mary Hospital · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HKChinese University of Hong Kong · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical experience gathered throughout the years has raised awareness of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDD). T cell receptor excision circles (TREC) and kappa-deleting recombination excision circles (KREC) assays for thymic and bone marrow outputs measurement have been widely implemented in newborn screening (NBS) programs for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency. The potential applications of combined TREC and KREC assay in PIDD diagnosis and immune reconstitution monitoring in non-neonatal patients have been suggested. Given that ethnicity, gender, and age can contribute to variations in immunity, defining the reference intervals of TREC and KREC levels in the local population is crucial for setting up cut-offs for PIDD diagnosis. In this retrospective study, 479 healthy Chinese sibling donors (240 males and 239 females; age range: 1 month-74 years) from Hong Kong were tested for TREC and KREC levels using a simultaneous quantitative real-time PCR assay. Age-specific 5

Indexed as

B-LymphocytesT-LymphocytesAdolescentBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolDNA, CircularFemaleHealthy VolunteersHong KongHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningReference ValuesBiomarkersDNA, Circularimmune reconstitutionK-deleting recombination excision circlesprimary immunodeficiencyreference intervalT cell receptor excision circles

Identifiers

PMID32765500
PMCPMC7378446
OpenAlexW3043784856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.