Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32765410›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2020

Acquired Visual Deficits Independent of Lesion Site in Acute Stroke.

Chamini Wijesundera, Algis J Vingrys, Tissa Wijeratne, Sheila G Crewther

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. DELP Treatment on Vision and Retinal Microcirculation in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Report of Five Cases and Literature Review.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Visual field testing and glaucoma drug prescribing patterns in Australia.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chamini WijesunderaSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Algis J VingrysDepartment of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Tissa WijeratneSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sheila G CrewtherSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Australian College of Optometry · AULa Trobe University · AUSunshine Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most clinical diagnoses of stroke are based on the persistence of symptoms relating to consciousness, language, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, neglect (visual), motor strength, and sensory loss following acute cerebral infarction. Yet despite the fact that most motor actions and cognition are driven by vision, functional vision

Indexed as

acute strokeischemicMelbourne Rapid Field-Neural (MRFn)visionvisual acuity-in-noisevisual fieldvisual function

Identifiers

PMID32765410
PMCPMC7380328
OpenAlexW3043120836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.