Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32765208›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Neurofeedback for Pain Management: A Systematic Review.

Rubén Roy, Rocío de la Vega, Mark P Jensen, Jordi Miró

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. tDCS and neurofeedback in ADHD treatment.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Modulating subjective pain perception with decoded Montreal Neurological Institute-space neurofeedback: a proof-of-concept study.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rubén RoyUniversitat Rovira i Virgili, Unit for the Study and Treatment of Pain-ALGOS, Department of Psychology, Research Center for Behavior Assessment (CRAMC), Tarragona, Spain.
Rocío de la VegaCenter for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Mark P JensenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jordi MiróUniversitat Rovira i Virgili, Unit for the Study and Treatment of Pain-ALGOS, Department of Psychology, Research Center for Behavior Assessment (CRAMC), Tarragona, Spain.
Universidad Rovira i Virgili · ESSeattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

SURVEY AND LONGITUDINAL STUDIES OF SECONDARY PAINP01HD033988 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JENSEN, MARK P · 1996 to 2006
$4.8M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD033988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

neurofeedbackneuromodulationpain managementsystematic reviewtreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID32765208
PMCPMC7378966
OpenAlexW3042473214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.