Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32765139›Full record

ArticleNature and science of sleep2020

Enhancing Slow Oscillations and Increasing N3 Sleep Proportion with Supervised, Non-Phase-Locked Pink Noise and Other Non-Standard Auditory Stimulation During NREM Sleep.

Margeaux M Schade, Gina Marie Mathew, Daniel M Roberts, Daniel Gartenberg, Orfeu M Buxton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic review: auditory stimulation and sleep.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Acoustic stimulation as a promising technique to enhance slow-wave sleep in Alzheimer's disease: results of a pilot study.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margeaux M Schade *Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Gina Marie Mathew *Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Daniel M RobertsProactive Life, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Daniel GartenbergProactive Life, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Orfeu M BuxtonBiobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5057-633X
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Business and regulatory development for Integrating sleep enhancement technology into clinical practiceR44AG056250 · NIA · PROACTIVE LIFE, INC. · PI GARTENBERG, DANIEL · 2020 to 2022
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS R44 AG056250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn non-rapid eye movement (NREM) stage 3 sleep (N3), phase-locked pink noise auditory stimulation can amplify slow oscillatory activity (0.5-1 Hz). Open-loop pink noise auditory stimulation can amplify slow oscillatory and delta frequency activity (0.5-4 Hz). We assessed the ability of pink noise and other sounds to elicit delta power, slow oscillatory power, and N3 sleep. PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsParticipants (

resultsTotal sleep time did not differ between conditions. Percentage of N3 was higher in the Enhancing condition, and lower in the Disruptive condition, versus Sham. Standard 0.8 Hz pink noise elicited low-frequency power more effectively than other pink noise, but was not the most effective stimulus. Both pink noise on the "Enhancing" night and sounds intended to Disrupt sleep administered on the "Disruptive" night increased momentary delta and slow-wave activity (ie, during stimulation versus the immediate pre-stimulation period). Disruptive auditory stimulation degraded sleep with frequent arousals and increased next-day vigilance lapses versus Sham despite preserved sleep duration and momentary increases in delta and slow-wave activity.

conclusionThese findings emphasize sound features of interest in ecologically valid, translational auditory intervention to increase restorative sleep. Preserving sleep continuity should be a primary consideration if auditory stimulation is used to enhance slow-wave activity.

Indexed as

delta powerelectroencephalographic spectral analysisneurobehavioral performancesleep fragmentationslow oscillationslow-wave sleep

Identifiers

PMID32765139
PMCPMC7364346
OpenAlexW3040949481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.