Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32765019›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2020

A Real-World Study Comparing Various Antimicrobial Regimens for Bloodstream Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli in a Tertiary Hospital, Shanghai, China, from 2010 to 2017.

Jiaying Tan, Wenjin Yu, Gang Wu, Jun Shen, Yong Fang, Hechen Zhu, Qianyi Xiao, Weixia Peng, Yukun Lan, Ye Gong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jiaying Tan *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, People's Republic of China.
Wenjin Yu *Department of Pharmacy , Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, People's Republic of China.
Gang WuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, People's Republic of China.
Jun ShenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, People's Republic of China.
Yong FangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, People's Republic of China.
Hechen ZhuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, People's Republic of China.
Qianyi XiaoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China.
Weixia PengDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China.
Yukun LanDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, People's Republic of China.
Ye GongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, People's Republic of China.
Fudan University · CNHuashan Hospital · CNShanghai Public Health Clinical Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe conducted a real-world analysis of the effectiveness of different antibiotic regimens for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) in a Chinese population.

methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted between January 2010 and December 2017. Patients with BSIs caused by CR-GNB confirmed by in vitro susceptibility tests were enrolled, and patient medical record data on antimicrobial agents and microbiological and clinical outcomes were extracted.

resultsA total of 175 individuals were included; 127 individuals (72.6%) received combination therapy (two or more antibiotics), while 48 individuals (27.4%) received monotherapy (single antibiotic). The all-cause 28-day mortality was 20.0%. Treatment success or presumed success rates were very similar between the monotherapy and combination therapy groups (58.3% versus 59.1%; P = 0.931). Combination therapy had a higher success rate trend than monotherapy in septic shock patients (40.7% versus 18.2%; P = 0.268). Improved therapeutic effects were observed in the active agent-containing group, although the differences were not significant.

conclusionCombination therapy likely has better therapeutic effects on critical BSIs caused by CR-GNB than monotherapy. Choosing a proper active agent in an antimicrobial regime is relatively crucial to the ultimate treatment outcome.

Indexed as

antimicrobial regimenbloodstream infectioncarbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilliChinese populationreal-worldtreatment success rate

Identifiers

PMID32765019
PMCPMC7382589
OpenAlexW3043624632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.