Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32764964›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2020

Cheng Zhou, Yajing Huang, Yongxu Chen, Yingjie Xie, Huihong Wen, Wei Tan, Changjun Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng ZhouSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yajing HuangGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3447-7689
Yongxu ChenSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0448-6709
Yingjie XieSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Huihong WenGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Wei TanGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangdong Geriatric Institute, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Changjun WangSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0420-4679
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAt present, there are few studies on the mechanisms underlying postoperative recurrence of liver cancer, and the mechanism of action of

methodsWe constructed a mouse liver orthotopic tumor model and a mouse liver recurrent tumor model. We measured the expression levels of the

results

conclusion

Indexed as

JNKliver cancermiR-602postoperative recurrenceRASSF1A

Identifiers

PMID32764964
PMCPMC7368130
OpenAlexW3040995929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.