Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32764900›Full record

ReviewClinical interventions in aging2020

Home-Based Cognitively Assistive Robots: Maximizing Cognitive Functioning and Maintaining Independence in Older Adults Without Dementia.

Ryan Van Patten, Amber V Keller, Jacqueline E Maye, Dilip V Jeste, Colin Depp, Laurel D Riek, Elizabeth W Twamley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical interventions in aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Virtual humans in geriatric care: an integrative review.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Age, Motor Function, and Cognitive Function Influence Preferences for Telerehabilitation Mediated by a Social Robot Augmented With Telepresence.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ryan Van PattenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Amber V KellerResearch Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2972-784X
Jacqueline E MayeCenter of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9073-2445
Dilip V JesteDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1161-7351
Colin DeppDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Laurel D RiekComputer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92063, USA.
Elizabeth W TwamleyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8693-8782

Funding

FELLOWSHIP IN GERIATRIC MENTAL HEALTHT32MH019934 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Elizabeth W Twamley · 1994 to 2026
$9.5M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019934RRD VA IK6 RX003504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Promoting health and prolonging independence in the home is a priority for older adults, caregivers, clinicians, and society at large. Rapidly developing robotics technology provides a platform for interventions, with the fields of physically and socially assistive robots expanding in recent years. However, less attention has been paid to using robots to enhance the cognitive health of older adults. The goal of this review is to synthesize the current literature on home-based cognitively assistive robots (CAR) in older adults without dementia and to provide suggestions to improve the quality of the scientific evidence in this subfield. First, we set the stage for CAR by: a) introducing the field of robotics to improve health, b) summarizing evidence emphasizing the importance of home-based interventions for older adults, c) reviewing literature on robot acceptability in older adults, d) highlighting important ethical issues in healthcare robotics, and e) reviewing current findings on socially assistive robots, with a focus on translating findings to the CAR context. With this foundation in place, we then review the literature on CAR, identifying gaps and limitations of current evidence, and proposing future directions for research. We conclude that CAR is promising and feasible and that there is a need for more methodologically rigorous evaluations of CAR to promote prolonged home-based independence in older adults.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingIndependent LivingAgedCaregiversCognitionCognitive DysfunctionHumansRoboticsSelf-Help DevicesUser-Computer Interfaceagingautonomycognitive statushealthy agingsuccessful agingtechnology

Identifiers

PMID32764900
PMCPMC7371917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.