ArticlePatient preference and adherence2020
Optimizing the Communication with Cancer Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Patient Perspectives.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effects of COVID-19 on Cancer Care Provision: A Systematic Review.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Trial
- Training Gaps in Digital Skills for the Cancer Health Care Workforce Based on Insights From Clinical Professionals, Nonclinical Professionals, and Patients and Caregivers: Qualitative Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Health-seeking behavior and anxiety of cancer patients in Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Article
- Availability and use of web-based interventions for patients with head and neck cancer: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2023Article
- The State-of-the-Art of Patient Portals: Adapting to External Factors, Addressing Barriers, and Innovating.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Review
- Patient knowledge, personal experience, and impact of the first wave of the COVD-19 pandemic in an Irish oncology cohort.Irish journal of medical science · 2023Article
- Remote monitoring of cancer patients during the Covid-19 pandemic - an interview study of nurses' and physicians' experiences.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- Cancer Patients' Experiences with Telehealth before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in British Columbia.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Adherence to Orally Administered Antineoplastics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Cancer patients' perspectives on remote monitoring at home during the COVID-19 pandemic- a qualitative study in Norway.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Factors Impacting Video Telehealth Appointment Completion During COVID-19 Pandemic Among People Living with HIV in a Community-Based Health System.AIDS and behavior · 2022Article
- Telemedicine for Rheumatology Patients in Covid-19 Pandemic: Perspectives of Patients.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on cancer management in military hospitals of Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2021Article
- Predictors of poor precautionary practices towards COVID-19 among cancer patients.Future oncology (London, England) · 2021Article
- Article
- Perceptions and practices of people with a total laryngectomy during COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods analysis.American journal of otolaryngologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring curfew, patients are self-isolated at home and worried. Patient-doctor interactions may be disrupted and therefore need to be replaced by alternative effective communication methods. PURPOSE: To describe the preferences of cancer patients with respect to communication methods and the use of patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs). To record the impact on cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and the knowledge and attitude of the patients towards it. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe created a self-administered electronic survey that was piloted and evaluated for its clinical relevance. Using convenient sampling methods, we surveyed the cancer patients in our Oncology Center.
resultsWe received 385 responses between April 15 and April 30, 2020. The preferred method for communication was a phone call with a 92% response rate followed by the electronic patient portal, mobile application, telemedicine and text message in 75%, 76%, 73%, and 72%, respectively. The majority (97%) preferred the use of PAEHRs for appointments, 95% for drug delivery and to view laboratory tests, and 92% in requesting medical reports. In our survey, 22% of patients with cancer reported that their medical cancer care had not been affected by COVID-19. They reported that trusted sources of information during COVID-19 included the Ministry of Health with 98% and doctors with 94%. Sixty-one percent know that they are more susceptible to COVID-19 infection and 91% of respondents supported the notion of digital transformation in the caring of cancer patients.
conclusionOur study revealed a general acceptance of patients to telecommunication as substitute to in-person interaction with their physicians. Interaction between cancer patients and health care providers should not be disrupted but should be augmented with more effective platforms to improve health care outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.