Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32764865›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Evaluation of Corneal Structure and Endothelial Morphological Characteristics in Type 2 Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients.

João N Beato, João Esteves-Leandro, David Reis, Manuel Falcão, Vítor Rosas, Ângela Carneiro, Fernando Falcão Reis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

João N BeatoDepartment of Ophthalmology, São João Hospital, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3820-4597
João Esteves-LeandroDepartment of Ophthalmology, São João Hospital, Porto, Portugal.
David ReisFaculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Manuel FalcãoDepartment of Ophthalmology, São João Hospital, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4718-0910
Vítor RosasDepartment of Ophthalmology, São João Hospital, Porto, Portugal.
Ângela CarneiroDepartment of Ophthalmology, São João Hospital, Porto, Portugal.
Fernando Falcão ReisDepartment of Ophthalmology, São João Hospital, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTHospital de São João · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare corneal structure and endothelial morphological features between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-diabetic patients; and determine if the DM duration, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) stage affect corneal morphological properties. PATIENTS AND

methodsSixty diabetic patients and 47 age- and sex-matched controls were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. DM group was analyzed according disease duration, HbA1c levels, and presence of retinopathy. Endothelial cell density (ECD) and morphology (average and coefficient of variation [CV] of cell size, percentage of hexagonal cells) were recorded using non-contact specular microscopy. Central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal volume were measured by scheimpflug tomography. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between demographical, clinical, and ocular variables with CCT and ECD.

resultsThere were no statistically significant differences in the endothelium cell density or morphology between DM and non-DM groups (p>0.05). Also, there was no statistical difference between groups for CCT or corneal volume (p>0.05). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that older age (p=0.028) was significantly associated with lower ECD; CCT was found to be significantly greater in males (p<0.001) and positively associated with corneal volume (p<0.001).

conclusionThe present study did not find any statistically significant differences between the corneal structural and endothelial characteristics of diabetic and non-diabetic subjects; other demographical parameters, such as age and gender, seem to be more determinant for the corneal properties.

Indexed as

central corneal thicknessdiabetes mellitusendothelium

Identifiers

PMID32764865
PMCPMC7369306
OpenAlexW3041802042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.