Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32764815›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Memory reconsolidation as a tool to endure encoding deficits in elderly.

Leonela M Tassone, Facundo A Urreta Benítez, Delfina Rochon, Paula B Martínez, Matias Bonilla, Candela S Leon, Carolina Muchnik, Patricia Solis, Nancy Medel, Silvia Kochen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Is Reconsolidation a General Property of Memory?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  7. The Intersection of Offline Learning and Rehabilitation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Leonela M TassoneLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la vida, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Facundo A Urreta BenítezLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la vida, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Delfina RochonLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la vida, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Paula B MartínezLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la vida, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Matias BonillaLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la vida, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Candela S LeonLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la vida, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Carolina MuchnikCentro de Neuropsiquiatría y Neurología de la Conducta- CENECON, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Patricia SolisUnidad Ejecutora de Estudios de Neurociencias y Sistemas Complejos, CONICET, Hospital El Cruce "Néstor Kirchner", Universidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche, Florencio Varela, Argentina.
Nancy MedelUnidad Ejecutora de Estudios de Neurociencias y Sistemas Complejos, CONICET, Hospital El Cruce "Néstor Kirchner", Universidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche, Florencio Varela, Argentina.
Silvia KochenConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Luis I BruscoCentro de Neuropsiquiatría y Neurología de la Conducta- CENECON, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Malen D MoyanoLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la vida, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Cecilia ForcatoLaboratorio de Sueño y Memoria, Departamento de Ciencias de la vida, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires (ITBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-5954-4008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Normal aging involves changes in the ability to acquire, consolidate and recall new information. It has been recently proposed that the reconsolidation process is also affected in older adults. Reconsolidation is triggered after reminder presentation, allowing memories to be modified: they can be impaired, strengthened or changed in their content. In young adults it was previously shown that the presentation of repetitive reminders induces memory strengthening one day after reactivation and the presentation of at least one reminder increases memory persistence several days after reactivation. However, until now this process has remained elusive in older adults. We hypothesize that older adults need a stronger reminder to induce memory strengthening through the reconsolidation process than young adults. To test this, we perform a three-day experiment. On day 1, participants learned 15 sound-word associations, on day 2 they received no reminders (NR group), one reminder (R group) or two rounds of reactivations (Rx2 group). Finally, they were tested on day 7. We found that, contrary to our hypothesis, older adults show a memory improvement triggered by repeated labilization/reconsolidation processes to an equal extent than young adults. These results open new perspectives into the use of reconsolidation to improve daily acquired information and the development of therapeutic home used tools to produce memory enhancement in healthy older adults or those with cognitive decline.

Indexed as

MemoryAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32764815
PMCPMC7413497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.