Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32764814›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Risk factors predicting osteosarcopenia in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: A retrospective study.

Hiroki Okamura, Koji Ishikawa, Yoshifumi Kudo, Akira Matsuoka, Hiroshi Maruyama, Haruka Emori, Ryo Yamamura, Chikara Hayakawa, Soji Tani, Koki Tsuchiya and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroki OkamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji IshikawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3689-5662
Yoshifumi KudoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira MatsuokaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi MaruyamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Haruka EmoriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo YamamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Chikara HayakawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Soji TaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koki TsuchiyaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiyuki ShirahataDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoaki ToyoneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi NagaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsunori InagakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Showa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in "osteosarcopenia" as the coexistence of osteoporosis and sarcopenia exacerbates negative outcomes. However, limited information is available regarding the risk factors of osteosarcopenia development in patients with osteoporosis. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed 276 consecutive patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis who regularly visited Showa University Hospital. Patients were eligible for the study if they were ≥65 years of age and underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, blood sampling, and physical performance assessment. Patients were divided into the osteosarcopenia and osteoporosis alone groups according to the diagnostic criteria of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Of the 276 patients with osteoporosis, 54 patients (19.6%) had osteosarcopenia. Patients in the osteosarcopenia group had a greater risk of frailty than did those in the osteoporosis alone group (odds ratio 2.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-4.80, P = 0.028). Low body mass index seemed to be the strongest factor related to the development of osteosarcopenia, and none of the patients in the osteosarcopenia group were obese (BMI ≥27.5 kg/m2). Multiple logistic analyses revealed that patients aged 65-74 years who had comorbidities such as kidney dysfunction and high levels of HbA1c were at risk of developing osteosarcopenia. Thus, we strongly recommend the assessment of the key components of the diagnosis of osteosarcopenia in an osteoporosis clinic for patients with low body mass index. Furthermore, appropriate assessments, including comorbidities, will help in identifying patients at greater risk of developing osteosarcopenia.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAccidental FallsAgedBody Mass IndexFemaleFrailtyHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor ILogistic ModelsMuscle StrengthOdds RatioOsteoporosisOsteosarcomaPostmenopauseRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsInsulin-Like Growth Factor I

Identifiers

PMID32764814
PMCPMC7413553
OpenAlexW3048235020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.