Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32764699›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and breast cancer risk: analysis by subtype and potential interactions.

Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Marcos Matabuena, Carmen M Redondo, Sandip Pravin Patel, Angel Carracedo, Sara Miranda Ponte, María Elena Martínez, J Esteban Castelao

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manuela Gago-DominguezGalician Public Foundation of Genomic Medicine (FPGMX), Genomic Medicine Group, International Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain. manuela.gago.dominguez@sergas.es.
Marcos MatabuenaCentro de Investigación en Tecnoloxías da Información (CITIUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Carmen M RedondoOncology and Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Vigo, Spain.
Sandip Pravin PatelMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8387-4840
Angel CarracedoGalician Public Foundation of Genomic Medicine (FPGMX), Genomic Medicine Group, International Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology Group, Health Research Institute of Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Sara Miranda PonteOncology and Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Vigo, Spain.
María Elena MartínezMoores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
J Esteban CastelaoOncology and Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Vigo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple studies have found the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to be associated with adverse breast cancer (BC) prognosis and survival. Very limited data exist on the role of NLR and risk of BC. The BREOGAN study is a population-based case-control study conducted in Galicia, Spain. We examined the WBC- and NLR-BC relationships. The risk of BC increased with increasing levels of neutrophils percentage (NE%) (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) = 2.14 (1.39-3.32), P-trend < 0.001) and of the NLR (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) = 1.93 (1.26-2.97), P-trend < 0.001). Lymphocytes absolute (L#) and percentage (L%) were associated with a decreased risk of BC (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) = 0.54 (0.35-0.83), and 0.51 (0.33-0.79), P-trend = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). The NLR-BC association was more pronounced among Luminal A BC (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) = 2.00 (1.17-3.45), P-trend < 0.001), HER2-negative BC (multivariable OR for the highest category (95% CI) = 1.87 (1.16-3.02), P-trend < 0.001), and those with high total cholesterol and low H

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHumansLymphocyte CountLymphocytesMenopauseMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingNeutrophilsPregnancyRisk

Identifiers

PMID32764699
PMCPMC7413522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.