Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32764609›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

An integrative multi-omics analysis to identify candidate DNA methylation biomarkers related to prostate cancer risk.

Lang Wu, Yaohua Yang, Xingyi Guo, Xiao-Ou Shu, Qiuyin Cai, Xiang Shu, Bingshan Li, Ran Tao, Chong Wu, Jason B Nikas and 20 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01221168 (ProGene), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01221168 recruitingnot on this map

ProGene: Etude Genetique et Epidemiologique du Cancer de la Prostate Familial

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre de Recherche sur les Pathologies ProstatiquesRan1996 to 2026Enrolled10,000ConditionsProstate Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 245 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cooperative learning for multiview analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 18 countries.

Lang Wu *Cancer Epidemiology Division, Population Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA. lwu@cc.hawaii.edu.
Yaohua Yang *Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Xingyi GuoDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Xiao-Ou ShuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Qiuyin CaiDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Xiang ShuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Bingshan LiDepartment of Molecular Physiology & Biophysics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2129-168X
Ran TaoVanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Chong WuDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8400-1785
Jason B NikasResearch & Development, Genomix Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9703-0422
Yanfa SunCancer Epidemiology Division, Population Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Jingjing ZhuCancer Epidemiology Division, Population Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Monique J RoobolDepartment of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6967-1708
Graham G GilesCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie St, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4946-9099
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Esther M JohnDepartment of Medicine (Oncology) and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Judith ClementsAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-QLD, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Biomedical Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Eli Marie GrindedalDepartment of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jong Y ParkDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6384-6447
Janet L StanfordDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Zsofia Kote-JaraiDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Christopher A HaimanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rosalind A EelesDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3698-6241
Wei ZhengDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1226-070X
Jirong LongDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. jirong.long@vumc.org.
PRACTICAL consortium
CRUK Consortium
BPC3 Consortium
CAPS Consortium
PEGASUS Consortium
National Cancer Institute · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBAmerican Cancer Society · USHarvard University · USKarolinska Institutet · SEManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBBrigham and Women's Hospital · USImperial College London · GBUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Washington · USErasmus MC · NLGerman Cancer Research Center · DEJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBMoffitt Cancer Center · USOslo University Hospital · NOStanford University · US

Funding

University of Hawaii Cancer Center CCSGP30CA071789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI GERTRAUD MASKARINEC · 1996 to 2026
$56.2M
High-Performance Computer Cluster for Biomedical ResearchS10OD023680 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS · 2017 to 2017
$587k
Cancer Research UK 29017Cancer Research UK 29186NCI NIH HHS P30 CA071789NIH HHS S10 OD023680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains elusive whether some of the associations identified in genome-wide association studies of prostate cancer (PrCa) may be due to regulatory effects of genetic variants on CpG sites, which may further influence expression of PrCa target genes. To search for CpG sites associated with PrCa risk, here we establish genetic models to predict methylation (N = 1,595) and conduct association analyses with PrCa risk (79,194 cases and 61,112 controls). We identify 759 CpG sites showing an association, including 15 located at novel loci. Among those 759 CpG sites, methylation of 42 is associated with expression of 28 adjacent genes. Among 22 genes, 18 show an association with PrCa risk. Overall, 25 CpG sites show consistent association directions for the methylation-gene expression-PrCa pathway. We identify DNA methylation biomarkers associated with PrCa, and our findings suggest that specific CpG sites may influence PrCa via regulating expression of candidate PrCa target genes.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesCpG IslandsDNA MethylationGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleModels, GeneticProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID32764609
PMCPMC7413371
OpenAlexW3047365219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.