Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32764410›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

The Versatility of Antioxidant Assays in Food Science and Safety-Chemistry, Applications, Strengths, and Limitations.

Nabeelah Bibi Sadeer, Domenico Montesano, Stefania Albrizio, Gokhan Zengin, Mohamad Fawzi Mahomoodally

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 233 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
233citing papers in PubMed
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

233 citing papers in PubMed, 550 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Solid-State Fermentation byMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Potent Therapeutic Insights FromFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  16. Phytochemical Characterization ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

173 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Nabeelah Bibi SadeerDepartment of Health Sciences; Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius, Réduit 80837, Mauritius.ORCID 0000-0002-0602-0059
Domenico MontesanoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Section of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Perugia, via S. Costanzo, 06126 Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8857-2091
Stefania AlbrizioDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Naples "Federico II", via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Gokhan ZenginDepartment of Biology, Science Faculty, Selcuk University, 42250 Konya Campus, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6548-7823
Mohamad Fawzi MahomoodallyDepartment of Health Sciences; Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius, Réduit 80837, Mauritius.ORCID 0000-0003-3962-8666
Department of Medical Sciences · BYIstituto Nazionale Biostrutture e Biosistemi · ITSelçuk University · TRUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there is a growing interest in screening and quantifying antioxidants from biological samples in the quest for natural and effective antioxidants to combat free radical-related pathological complications. Antioxidant assays play a crucial role in high-throughput and cost-effective assessment of antioxidant capacities of natural products such as medicinal plants and food samples. However, several investigators have expressed concerns about the reliability of existing in vitro assays. Such concerns arise mainly from the poor correlation between in vitro and in vivo results. In addition, in vitro assays have the problem of reproducibility. To date, antioxidant capacities are measured using a panel of assays whereby each assay has its own advantages and limitations. This unparalleled review hotly disputes on in vitro antioxidant assays and elaborates on the chemistry behind each assay with the aim to point out respective principles/concepts. The following critical questions are also addressed: (1) What make antioxidant assays coloured? (2) What is the reason for working at a particular wavelength? (3) What are the advantages and limitations of each assay? and (4) Why is a particular colour observed in antioxidant-oxidant chemical reactions? Furthermore, this review details the chemical mechanism of reactions that occur in each assay together with a colour ribbon to illustrate changes in colour. The review ends with a critical conclusion on existing assays and suggests constructive improvements on how to develop an adequate and universal antioxidant assay.

Indexed as

antioxidantschemical reactionscolorimetryfree radicalslimitationsoxidative stressspectrophotometer

Identifiers

PMID32764410
PMCPMC7464350
OpenAlexW3047122575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.