Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32764254›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Impact of Fermentation and Phytase Treatment of Pea-Oat Protein Blend on Physicochemical, Sensory, and Nutritional Properties of Extruded Meat Analogs.

Aleksei Kaleda, Karel Talvistu, Martti Tamm, Maret Viirma, Julia Rosend, Kristel Tanilas, Marie Kriisa, Natalja Part, Mari-Liis Tammik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mechanochemical Degradation of Biopolymers.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Quantitative Analysis of Oat (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aleksei KaledaCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies, Akadeemia tee 15a, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-9003-130X
Karel TalvistuCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies, Akadeemia tee 15a, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.
Martti TammCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies, Akadeemia tee 15a, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.
Maret ViirmaCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies, Akadeemia tee 15a, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.
Julia RosendCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies, Akadeemia tee 15a, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-4969-2904
Kristel TanilasCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies, Akadeemia tee 15a, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.
Marie KriisaCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies, Akadeemia tee 15a, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.
Natalja PartCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies, Akadeemia tee 15a, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.
Mari-Liis TammikCenter of Food and Fermentation Technologies, Akadeemia tee 15a, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia.

Funding

Estonian Ministry of Education and Research RESTA17The Good Food Institute Fermentation of oat protein for application in extruded meat analogs
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant materials that are used for the production of extruded meat analogs are often nutritionally incomplete and also contain antinutrients, thus there is a need to explore alternative plant proteins and pre-treatments. This study demonstrates application of phytase and fermentation to a pea-oat protein blend with a good essential amino acid profile and subsequent texturization using extrusion cooking. Enzymatic treatment reduced the content of antinutrient phytic acid by 32%. Extrusion also degraded phytic acid by up to 18%, but the effect depended on the material. Differences in physicochemical, sensorial, and textural properties between untreated and phytase-treated extruded meat analogs were small. In contrast, fermented material was more difficult to texturize due to degradation of macromolecules; physicochemical and textural properties of extrudates were markedly different; sensory analysis showed enhancement of flavor, but also detected an increase in some unwanted taste attributes (bitterness, cereal and off-taste). Phytic acid was not degraded by fermentation. Analysis of volatile compounds showed extrusion eliminated volatiles from the raw material but introduced Maillard reaction products. Overall, phytase treatment and fermentation demonstrated the potential for application in extruded meat analogs but also highlighted the necessity of optimization of process conditions.

Indexed as

extrusionfermentationmeat analogphytic acid

Identifiers

PMID32764254
PMCPMC7465559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.