Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32764143›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Large-scale informatic analysis to algorithmically identify blood biomarkers of neurological damage.

Grant C O'Connell, Megan L Alder, Christine G Smothers, Julia H C Chang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Blood Biomarkers in Brain Injury Medicine.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Grant C O'ConnellSchool of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106 grant.oconnell@case.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2642-6670
Megan L AlderSchool of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106.ORCID 0000-0002-7817-3476
Christine G SmothersSchool of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Julia H C ChangSchool of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of precision blood biomarkers which can accurately indicate damage to brain tissue could yield molecular diagnostics with the potential to improve how we detect and treat neurological pathologies. However, a majority of candidate blood biomarkers for neurological damage that are studied today are proteins which were arbitrarily proposed several decades before the advent of high-throughput omic techniques, and it is unclear whether they represent the best possible targets relative to the remainder of the human proteome. Here, we leveraged mRNA expression data generated from nearly 12,000 human specimens to algorithmically evaluate over 17,000 protein-coding genes in terms of their potential to produce blood biomarkers for neurological damage based on their expression profiles both across the body and within the brain. The circulating levels of proteins associated with the top-ranked genes were then measured in blood sampled from a diverse cohort of patients diagnosed with a variety of acute and chronic neurological disorders, including ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, traumatic brain injury, Alzheimer's disease, and multiple sclerosis, and evaluated for their diagnostic performance. Our analysis identifies several previously unexplored candidate blood biomarkers of neurological damage with possible clinical utility, many of which whose presence in blood is likely linked to specific cell-level pathologic processes. Furthermore, our findings also suggest that many frequently cited previously proposed blood biomarkers exhibit expression profiles which could limit their diagnostic efficacy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersBrainBrain InjuriesComputational BiologyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisNervous System DiseasesNeuropathologyProteomeStrokeBiomarkersProteomeAlzheimer’s diseasemolecular diagnosticsmultiple sclerosisstroketraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32764143
PMCPMC7456103
OpenAlexW3048248001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.