Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32764087›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Does theory of planned behaviour play a role in predicting uptake of colorectal cancer screening? A cross-sectional study in Hong Kong.

Junjie Huang, Jingxuan Wang, Tiffany Wing-Yin Pang, Maggie Ka-Ying Chan, Sophia Leung, Xiao Chen, Colette Leung, Zhi-Jie Zheng, Martin Chi-Sang Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Junjie HuangJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2382-4443
Jingxuan WangJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1570-7266
Tiffany Wing-Yin PangJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3906-9999
Maggie Ka-Ying ChanJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sophia LeungJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xiao ChenJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2108-2215
Colette LeungJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3130-8783
Zhi-Jie ZhengDepartment of Global Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0233-5010
Martin Chi-Sang WongJockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China wong_martin@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0001-7706-9370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveColorectal cancer (CRC) ranked second in terms of cancer mortality worldwide. It is associated with a substantial global disease burden. We aimed to examine whether the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) could predict the uptake of faecal immunochemical test to inform novel strategies for enhancing CRC screening participation in population-based programmes.

designCross-sectional study. SETTINGS: A Hong Kong-based and territory-wide telephone survey was conducted during the study period from October 2017 to November 2018.

participants4800 asymptomatic individuals aged 61-70 years who can communicate in Cantonese were recruited during the survey period. Those who had a history of CRC, chronic bowel inflammation, two or more first-degree relatives with CRC, and received colonoscopy in the past 10 years or faecal occult blood test in the past 5 years were excluded. OUTCOME MEASURES: The association between CRC screening uptake and the factors pertinent to TPB was analysed by univariable and multivariable regression models and the mediating effect of intention. We adjusted for age, gender, educational level, marital and working status, as well as household income.

resultsMultivariable regression analysis showed that high perceived behavioural control (adjusted OR (AOR)=12.35, 95% CI 8.21 to 18.60, p<0.001), high intention for CRC screening (AOR=7.86, 95% CI 6.60 to 9.36, p<0.001) and positive attitude towards CRC screening (accuracy and effectiveness: AOR=1.19, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.38, p<0.05; embarrassment and apprehension: AOR=4.27, 95% CI 3.13 to 5.82, p<0.001) were significantly associated with CRC screening uptake. Mediation analysis found that the effect of social norms on screening behaviour was primarily mediated by intention (83.2%), and this indirect, mediated effect accounted for 21.7% to 24.1% of total effects of other constructs in TPB on screening behaviour.

conclusionsThe variables pertinent to TPB could successfully predict CRC screening uptake. Promotion of CRC screening based on interventions that increase perceived behavioural control and behavioural intention could potentially enhance screening uptake. Further studies are needed to establish the cause and effect relationship among these variables and screening uptake, as well as to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of such interventions.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHong KongHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult Bloodgastroenterologyoncologypreventive medicineprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID32764087
PMCPMC7412617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.