Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32763850›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2020

Investigation of Axial and Angular Sampling in Multi-Detector Pinhole-SPECT Brain Imaging.

Navid Zeraatkar, Kesava S Kalluri, Benjamin Auer, Arda Konik, Timothy J Fromme, Lars R Furenlid, Phillip H Kuo, Michael A King

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Navid Zeraatkar
Kesava S Kalluri
Benjamin Auer
Arda Konik
Timothy J Fromme
Lars R Furenlid
Phillip H Kuo
Michael A King
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USBanner - University Medical Center Tucson · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Arizona · USWorcester Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

Upgrading AdaptiSPECT-C for High Spatial Resolution Imaging of Brain Lymphatics and Vasculature to Advance Therapies for Alzheimer’s DiseaseR01EB022521 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FURENLID, LARS R, KING, MICHAEL A · 2016 to 2021
$5.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We designed a dedicated multi-detector multi-pinhole brain SPECT scanner to generate images of higher quality compared to general-purpose systems. The system, AdaptiSPECT-C, is intended to adapt its sensitivity-resolution trade-off by varying its aperture configurations allowing both high-sensitivity dynamic and high-spatial-resolution static imaging. The current system design consists of 23 detector heads arranged in a truncated spherical geometry. In this work, we investigated the axial and angular sampling capability of the current stationary system design. Two data acquisition schemes using limited rotation of the gantry and two others using axial translation of the imaging bed were also evaluated concerning their impact on image quality through improved sampling. Increasing both angular and axial sampling in the current prototype system resulted in quantitative improvements in image quality metrics and qualitative appearance of the images as determined in studies with specifically selected phantoms. Visual improvements for the brain phantoms with clinical distributions were less pronounced but presented quantitative improvements in the fidelity (normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE)) and striatal specific binding ratio (SBR) for a dopamine transporter (DAT) distribution, and in NRMSE and activity recovery for a brain perfusion distribution. More pronounced improvements with increased sampling were seen in contrast recovery coefficient, bias, and coefficient of variation for a lesion in the brain perfusion distribution. The negligible impact of the most cranial ring of detectors on axial sampling, but its significant impact on sensitivity and angular sampling in the cranial portion of the imaging volume-of-interest were also determined.

Indexed as

BrainTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeuroimagingPhantoms, Imaging

Identifiers

PMID32763850
PMCPMC7875096
OpenAlexW3047952284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.