Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32763848›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence2022

Performing Group Difference Testing on Graph Structured Data From GANs: Analysis and Applications in Neuroimaging.

Tuan Q Dinh, Yunyang Xiong, Zhichun Huang, Tien Vo, Akshay Mishra, Won Hwa Kim, Sathya N Ravi, Vikas Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tuan Q Dinh
Yunyang Xiong
Zhichun Huang
Tien Vo
Akshay Mishra
Won Hwa Kim
Sathya N Ravi
Vikas Singh

Funding

Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's PreventionRF1AG027161 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JOHNSON, STERLING C · 2018 to 2018
$18.8M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP50AG033514 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHAPPELL, RICHARD J · 2009 to 2018
$16.2M
TrainingU54AI117924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRAVEN, MARK W. · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
White matter degeneration: biomarkers in preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG037639 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BENDLIN, BARBARA BRIGITTA · 2012 to 2023
$5.3M
Algebraic Formulations for Characterizing Structural Brain Connectivity Changes and Pathology Transmission Networks in Preclinical Alzheimer's DiseaseRF1AG059312 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BENDLIN, BARBARA BRIGITTA, SINGH, VIKAS · 2019 to 2019
$1.8M
Maximizing Power in AD Clinical Trials via Multimodal Machine LearningR01AG040396 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SINGH, VIKAS · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
Manifold-valued statistical models for longitudinal morphometic analysis in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD)R01EB022883 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI JOHNSON, STERLING C, SINGH, VIKAS · 2016 to 2018
$995k
CRCNS: Pooling Multisite data and Staistical Tests for analyzing biomarkers of Alzheimer's diseaseRF1AG062336 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SINGH, VIKAS · 2018 to 2018
$660k
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117924NIA NIH HHS P50 AG033514NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037639NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040396NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG027161NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG059312NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG062336NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have emerged as a powerful generative model in computer vision. Given their impressive abilities in generating highly realistic images, they are also being used in novel ways in applications in the life sciences. This raises an interesting question when GANs are used in scientific or biomedical studies. Consider the setting where we are restricted to only using the samples from a trained GAN for downstream group difference analysis (and do not have direct access to the real data). Will we obtain similar conclusions? In this work, we explore if "generated" data, i.e., sampled from such GANs can be used for performing statistical group difference tests in cases versus controls studies, common across many scientific disciplines. We provide a detailed analysis describing regimes where this may be feasible. We complement the technical results with an empirical study focused on the analysis of cortical thickness on brain mesh surfaces in an Alzheimer's disease dataset. To exploit the geometric nature of the data, we use simple ideas from spectral graph theory to show how adjustments to existing GANs can yield improvements. We also give a generalization error bound by extending recent results on Neural Network Distance. To our knowledge, our work offers the first analysis assessing whether the Null distribution in "healthy versus diseased subjects" type statistical testing using data generated from the GANs coincides with the one obtained from the same analysis with real data. The code is available at https://github.com/yyxiongzju/GLapGAN.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedBrainHumansNeural Networks, ComputerNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID32763848
PMCPMC7867665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.