Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32763750›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2021

Ultrasound freeze-thawing style pretreatment to improve the efficiency of the vacuum freeze-drying of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) and the quality characteristics of the dried product.

Xin Xu, Lei Zhang, Yabin Feng, Cunshan Zhou, Abu ElGasim A Yagoub, Hafida Wahia, Haile Ma, Jin Zhang, Yanhui Sun

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xin XuSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, People's Republic of China.
Lei ZhangSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, People's Republic of China.
Yabin FengSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, People's Republic of China.
Cunshan ZhouSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, People's Republic of China; School of Biological and Food Engineering, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou 239000, People's Republic of China. Electronic address: cunshanzhou@163.com.
Abu ElGasim A YagoubDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Hafida WahiaSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, People's Republic of China.
Haile MaSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, People's Republic of China.
Jin ZhangSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, People's Republic of China.
Yanhui SunSchool of Biological and Food Engineering, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou 239000, People's Republic of China.
Jiangsu University · CNChuzhou University · CNKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vacuum freeze-drying is a new and high technology on agricultural product dehydrating dry, but it faces the high cost problem caused by high energy consumption. This study investigated the effect of ultrasound (US), freeze-thawing (including the freeze-air thawing (AT), freeze-water thawing (WT), freeze-ultrasound thawing (UST), and freeze-air ultrasound thawing (AT + US)) pretreatments on the vacuum freeze-drying efficiency and the quality of dried okra. The results indicated that the application of ultrasound and different freeze-thawing pretreatments reduced the drying time by 25.0%-62.50% and the total energy consumption was 24.28%-62.35% less. The AT pretreatment reduced the time by of okra slices by 62.50% and the total energy consumption was 62.35% less. The significant decrease in drying time was due to a change in the microstructure caused by pretreatment. Besides, the okra pretreated with the US retained most of the quality characteristics (flavor, color, hardness, and frangibility) among all methods, while, AT + US had the most changeable characteristics in quality, which is deprecated in our study. The okra pretreated with the US and AT, separately, had the best dry matter content loss (9.008%, 5.602%), lower chlorophyll degradation (5.05%, 5.44% less), and higher contents of total phenolics, total flavonoids, and pectin, with strong antioxidant capacity, compared to other methods. The pretreatments did not have a large effect on the functional groups and the structure of pectin, but slightly affected the viscosity. It can be concluded that AT and US pretreatment methods are better than others.

Indexed as

Freeze DryingAbelmoschusDesiccationElectronic NoseSonicationSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredVacuumFreeze-thawingOkraQuality characteristicsUltrasoundVacuum-freeze drying efficiency

Identifiers

PMID32763750
PMCPMC7786574
OpenAlexW3046630880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.