Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32763649›Full record

Trial reportSocial science & medicine (1982)2020

Parenting, mental health and economic pathways to prevention of violence against children in South Africa.

L Cluver, Y Shenderovich, F Meinck, M N Berezin, J Doubt, C L Ward, J Parra-Cardona, C Lombard, J M Lachman, C Wittesaele and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Social science & medicine (1982), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

L CluverCentre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: lucie.cluver@spi.ox.ac.uk.
Y ShenderovichCentre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom. Electronic address: yulia.shenderovich@spi.ox.ac.uk.
F MeinckSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Optentia, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, South Africa. Electronic address: Franziska.Meinck@ed.ac.uk.
M N BerezinCentre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Applied Psychology, New York University, New York, USA. Electronic address: mnb387@nyu.edu.
J DoubtCentre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jennydoubt@gmail.com.
C L WardDepartment of Psychology, University of Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: Catherine.Ward@uct.ac.za.
J Parra-CardonaSteve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Texas, USA. Electronic address: rparra@austin.utexas.edu.
C LombardBiostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, South Africa. Electronic address: carl.lombard@mrc.ac.za.
J M LachmanCentre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasglow, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jamie.lachman@spi.ox.ac.uk.
C WittesaeleCentre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: camille.wittesaele@spi.ox.ac.uk.
I WesselsCentre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: inge.wessels@spi.ox.ac.uk.
F GardnerCentre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: frances.gardner@wolfson.ox.ac.uk.
J I SteinertCentre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; TUM School of Governance, Technical University of Munich, Germany. Electronic address: janina.steinert@tum.de.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZAMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBNew York University · USNorth-West University · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZATechnical University of Munich · DEThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARK D. HAYWARD · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
Chief Scientist Office SPHSU14Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/14NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParenting programs based on social learning theory have increasing empirical evidence for reducing violence against children. Trials are primarily from high-income countries and with young children. Globally, we know little about how parenting programs work to reduce violence, with no known studies in low or middle-income countries (LMICs). This study examines mechanisms of change of a non-commercialized parenting program, Parenting for Lifelong Health for Teens, designed with the World Health Organization and UNICEF. A cluster randomized trial showed main effects on parenting and other secondary outcomes. We conducted secondary analysis of trial data to investigate five potential mediators of reduced violence against children: improved parenting, adolescent behaviour, caregiver mental health, alcohol/drug avoidance, and family economic strengthening.

methodsThe trial was implemented in rural South Africa with 40 sites, n = 552 family dyads (including adolescents aged 10-18 and primary caregivers). Intervention sites (n = 20) received the 14-session parenting program delivered by local community members, including modules on family budgeting and savings. Control sites (n = 20) received a brief informational workshop. Emotional and physical violence against children/adolescents and each potential mediator were reported by adolescents and caregivers at baseline and 9-13 months post-randomisation. Structural equation modelling was used to test simultaneous hypothesized pathways to violence reduction.

resultsImprovements in four pathways mediated reduced violence against children: 1) improved parenting practices, 2) improved caregiver mental health (reduced depression), 3) increased caregiver alcohol/drug avoidance and 4) improved family economic welfare. Improved child behaviour was not a mediator, although it was associated with less violence.

conclusionsSimultaneously bolstering a set of family processes can reduce violence. Supporting self-care and positive coping for caregivers may be essential in challenging contexts. In countries with minimal or no economic safety nets, linking social learning parenting programs with economic strengthening skills may bring us closer to ending violence against children.

Indexed as

Mental HealthParentingAdolescentCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolHumansSouth AfricaViolenceAdolescenceAlcoholDepressionParentingPovertyViolence

Identifiers

PMID32763649
PMCPMC10782842
OpenAlexW3044607528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.