Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32763427›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Predicting Alzheimer's disease progression using deep recurrent neural networks.

Minh Nguyen, Tong He, Lijun An, Daniel C Alexander, Jiashi Feng, B T Thomas Yeo, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Knockout: A simple way to handle missing inputs.Transactions on machine learning research · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Cross-dataset Evaluation of Dementia Longitudinal Progression Prediction Models.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Minh NguyenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Centre for Sleep and Cognition (CSC) & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research (TMR), National University of Singapore, Singapore; N.1 Institute for Health & Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Tong HeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Centre for Sleep and Cognition (CSC) & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research (TMR), National University of Singapore, Singapore; N.1 Institute for Health & Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Lijun AnDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Centre for Sleep and Cognition (CSC) & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research (TMR), National University of Singapore, Singapore; N.1 Institute for Health & Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Daniel C AlexanderCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.
Jiashi FengDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
B T Thomas YeoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Centre for Sleep and Cognition (CSC) & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research (TMR), National University of Singapore, Singapore; N.1 Institute for Health & Institute for Digital Medicine (WisDM), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: thomas.yeo@nus.edu.sg.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Project 4P41EB015896 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2018
$9.8M
A Storage Area Network for Structural and Functional Image AnalysisS10RR023401 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FISCHL, BRUCE · 2009 to 2009
$2.0M
SILICON GRAPHICS PRISM EXTREME 128P/1TBS10RR023043 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SORENSEN, ALMA GREGORY · 2006 to 2006
$1.5M
Computeserver Structural &Functional Image AnalysisS10RR019307 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FISCHL, BRUCE · 2004 to 2004
$496k
CIHRNCRR NIH HHS S10 RR019307NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023043NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023401NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early identification of individuals at risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia is important for developing disease-modifying therapies. In this study, given multimodal AD markers and clinical diagnosis of an individual from one or more timepoints, we seek to predict the clinical diagnosis, cognition and ventricular volume of the individual for every month (indefinitely) into the future. We proposed and applied a minimal recurrent neural network (minimalRNN) model to data from The Alzheimer's Disease Prediction Of Longitudinal Evolution (TADPOLE) challenge, comprising longitudinal data of 1677 participants (Marinescu et al., 2018) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We compared the performance of the minimalRNN model and four baseline algorithms up to 6 years into the future. Most previous work on predicting AD progression ignore the issue of missing data, which is a prevalent issue in longitudinal data. Here, we explored three different strategies to handle missing data. Two of the strategies treated the missing data as a "preprocessing" issue, by imputing the missing data using the previous timepoint ("forward filling") or linear interpolation ("linear filling). The third strategy utilized the minimalRNN model itself to fill in the missing data both during training and testing ("model filling"). Our analyses suggest that the minimalRNN with "model filling" compared favorably with baseline algorithms, including support vector machine/regression, linear state space (LSS) model, and long short-term memory (LSTM) model. Importantly, although the training procedure utilized longitudinal data, we found that the trained minimalRNN model exhibited similar performance, when using only 1 input timepoint or 4 input timepoints, suggesting that our approach might work well with just cross-sectional data. An earlier version of our approach was ranked 5th (out of 53 entries) in the TADPOLE challenge in 2019. The current approach is ranked 2nd out of 63 entries as of June 3rd, 2020.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDisease ProgressionModels, TheoreticalAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID32763427
PMCPMC7797176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.