ArticleStem cell reports2020
Direct Comparison of Four Hematopoietic Differentiation Methods from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Article in Stem cell reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- New approach methodologies (NAMs) to support regulatory assessment of developmental immunotoxicity - a new PARC project.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- Modeling myeloid cell development in health and disease using induced pluripotent stem cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Culturing Potential: advances in ex vivo cell culture systems for haematopoietic cell-based regenerative therapies.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Immunoregulatory iPSC-derived non-lymphoid progeny in autoimmunity and GVHD alloimmunity.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2025Review
- Improving hematopoietic differentiation from human induced pluripotent stem cells by the modulation of Hippo signaling with a diarylheptanoid derivative.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Article
- Comparison of osteoclast differentiation protocols from human induced pluripotent stem cells of different tissue origins.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Article
- Human Endometrium Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Are Amenable to Directed Erythroid Differentiation.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of osteoclast differentiation protocols from human induced pluripotent stem cells of different tissue origins.Research square · 2023Article
- Review
- Role of Cytokines and Growth Factors in the Manufacturing of iPSC-Derived Allogeneic Cell Therapy Products.Biology · 2023Review
- Recent updates of stem cell-based erythropoiesis.Human cell · 2023Review
- In vitro erythrocyte production using human-induced pluripotent stem cells: determining the best hematopoietic stem cell sources.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Article
- De Novo Generation of Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells from Pluripotent Stem Cells for Cellular Therapy.Cells · 2023Review
- Immune cells and RBCs derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells: method, progress, prospective challenges.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- Erythroid Differentiation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Co-cultured with OP9 Cells for Diagnostic Purposes.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Industrially Compatible Transfusable iPSC-Derived RBCs: Progress, Challenges and Prospective Solutions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Hypoxic Conditions Promote the Angiogenic Potential of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are an invaluable resource for the study of human disease. However, there are no standardized methods for differentiation into hematopoietic cells, and there is a lack of robust, direct comparisons of different methodologies. In the current study we improved a feeder-free, serum-free method for generation of hematopoietic cells from iPSCs, and directly compared this with three other commonly used strategies with respect to efficiency, repeatability, hands-on time, and cost. We also investigated their capability and sensitivity to model genetic hematopoietic disorders in cells derived from Down syndrome and β-thalassemia patients. Of these methods, a multistep monolayer-based method incorporating aryl hydrocarbon receptor hyperactivation ("2D-multistep") was the most efficient, generating significantly higher numbers of CD34
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.