Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32762986›Full record

ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2020

Heterogeneous Patient Preferences for Modern Antiretroviral Therapy: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Jan Ostermann, Axel Mühlbacher, Derek S Brown, Dean A Regier, Amy Hobbie, Andrew Weinhold, Noor Alshareef, Caroline Derrick, Nathan M Thielman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jan OstermannDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Axel MühlbacherInstitute of Health Economics and Healthcare Management, Hochschule Neubrandenburg, Neubrandenburg, Germany.
Derek S BrownBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Dean A RegierCancer Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Amy HobbieDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Andrew WeinholdDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Noor AlshareefDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Caroline DerrickDepartment of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Nathan M ThielmanDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: n.thielman@duke.edu.

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGIA Doris TOMARAS · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLimited data describe patient preferences for the growing number of antiretroviral therapies (ARTs). We quantified preferences for key characteristics of modern ART deemed relevant to shared decision making.

methodsA discrete choice experiment survey elicited preferences for ART characteristics, including dosing (frequency and number of pills), administration characteristics (pill size and meal requirement), most bothersome side effect (from diarrhea, sleep disturbance, headaches, dizziness/difficulty thinking, depression, or jaundice), and most bothersome long-term effect (from increased risk of heart attacks, bone fractures, renal dysfunction, hypercholesterolemia, or hyperglycemia). Between March and August 2017, the discrete choice experiment was fielded to 403 treatment-experienced persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), enrolled from 2 infectious diseases clinics in the southern United States and a national online panel. Participants completed 16 choice tasks, each comparing 3 treatment options. Preferences were analyzed using mixed and latent class logit models.

resultsMost participants were male (68%) and older (interquartile range: 42-58 years), and had substantial treatment experience (interquartile range: 7-21 years). In mixed logit analyses, all attributes were associated with preferences. Side and long-term effects were most important, with evidence of substantial preference heterogeneity. Latent class analysis identified 5 preference classes. For classes 1 (40%), 2 (24%), and 3 (21%), side effects were most important, followed by long-term effects. For class 4 (10%), dosing was most important. Class 5 (4%) was largely indifferent to ART characteristics.

conclusionOverall, treatment-experienced persons living with HIV valued minimizing side effects and long-term toxicities over dosing and administration characteristics. Preferences varied widely, highlighting the need to elicit individual patient preferences in models of shared antiretroviral decision making.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision Making, SharedPatient PreferenceAdultAgedAnti-HIV AgentsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-HIV Agentsantiretroviral therapydiscrete choice experimentHIVlatent class analysispatient preferencesshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID32762986
PMCPMC10267714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.