ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2020
Heterogeneous Patient Preferences for Modern Antiretroviral Therapy: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.
Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Pooled it
- Preferences of People Living with HIV for Long-Acting Antiretroviral Treatment in Germany: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment.The patient · 2023Pooled it
- Use of Stated Preference Methods in HIV Treatment and Prevention Research in the United States: A Systematic Review.AIDS and behavior · 2023Pooled it
- Do people with HIV really have the choice between oral and injectable ART? Evidence from a multicentric survey in the Swiss HIV cohort study.HIV medicine · 2026Article
- Identifying Preferences for Prostate Cancer Screening Among American Indian Men (Project AIMEPCCo): Protocol for a Discrete Choice Experiment.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Young Adult Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence-Based Medication Counseling in China: Discrete Choice Experiment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Putting the substance in substantial evidence: an evidence-based approach to flexible drug regulation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- What is a star worth to Medicare beneficiaries? A discrete choice experiment of hospital quality ratings.Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
- Public Heterogeneous Preferences for Low-Dose Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Service Delivery in Western China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Medicare Beneficiaries' Perspectives on the Quality of Hospital Care and Their Implications for Value-Based Payment.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Understanding Treatment Preferences Among People Living with HIV in Australia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- What drives the acceptability of restrictive health policies: An experimental assessment of individual preferences for anti-COVID 19 strategies.Economic modelling · 2022Article
- Physicians' preferences and willingness to pay for artificial intelligence-based assistance tools: a discrete choice experiment among german radiologists.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Preferences for transitional HIV care among people living with HIV recently released from prison in Zambia: a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2021Article
- What factors influence HIV testing? Modeling preference heterogeneity using latent classes and class-independent random effects.Journal of choice modelling · 2021Article
- Patients' preferences for antiretroviral therapy service provision: a systematic review.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2021Review
- Starting Antihypertensive Drug Treatment With Combination Therapy: Controversies in Hypertension - Con Side of the Argument.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLimited data describe patient preferences for the growing number of antiretroviral therapies (ARTs). We quantified preferences for key characteristics of modern ART deemed relevant to shared decision making.
methodsA discrete choice experiment survey elicited preferences for ART characteristics, including dosing (frequency and number of pills), administration characteristics (pill size and meal requirement), most bothersome side effect (from diarrhea, sleep disturbance, headaches, dizziness/difficulty thinking, depression, or jaundice), and most bothersome long-term effect (from increased risk of heart attacks, bone fractures, renal dysfunction, hypercholesterolemia, or hyperglycemia). Between March and August 2017, the discrete choice experiment was fielded to 403 treatment-experienced persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), enrolled from 2 infectious diseases clinics in the southern United States and a national online panel. Participants completed 16 choice tasks, each comparing 3 treatment options. Preferences were analyzed using mixed and latent class logit models.
resultsMost participants were male (68%) and older (interquartile range: 42-58 years), and had substantial treatment experience (interquartile range: 7-21 years). In mixed logit analyses, all attributes were associated with preferences. Side and long-term effects were most important, with evidence of substantial preference heterogeneity. Latent class analysis identified 5 preference classes. For classes 1 (40%), 2 (24%), and 3 (21%), side effects were most important, followed by long-term effects. For class 4 (10%), dosing was most important. Class 5 (4%) was largely indifferent to ART characteristics.
conclusionOverall, treatment-experienced persons living with HIV valued minimizing side effects and long-term toxicities over dosing and administration characteristics. Preferences varied widely, highlighting the need to elicit individual patient preferences in models of shared antiretroviral decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.