Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32762839›Full record

GuidelineeLife2020

Actionable recommendations from trainees to improve science training.

Stephanie M Davis, Harinder Singh, Cara M Weismann, Adriana Bankston, Juan Pablo Ruiz Villalobos

Abstract readGuideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie M DavisFuture of Research, Pittsfield, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3895-8444
Harinder SinghFuture of Research, Pittsfield, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0160-1575
Cara M WeismannFuture of Research, Pittsfield, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6121-6134
Adriana BankstonFuture of Research, Pittsfield, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5406-856X
Juan Pablo Ruiz VillalobosFuture of Research, Pittsfield, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1335-8840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, a series of reports written by groups of senior researchers and administrators have recommended changes to improve the training environments for graduate students and postdoctoral researchers in the United States. However, academic institutions and departments have largely failed to implement these recommendations, which has exacerbated the problems faced by these trainees. Here, based on input from trainees at different career stages, we outline seven practical changes that academic institutions and departments can make to improve their training environments.

Indexed as

StudentsEducation, GraduateHumansResearch PersonnelSchoolsScienceUnited StatesVocational Guidanceearly-career researchersmentorshipnoneresearch culturescience training

Identifiers

PMID32762839
PMCPMC7413740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.