Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32762770›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2020

Mouse CD146+ muscle interstitial progenitor cells differ from satellite cells and present myogenic potential.

Bartosz Mierzejewski, Iwona Grabowska, Daniel Jackowski, Aliksandra Irhashava, Zuzanna Michalska, Władysława Stremińska, Katarzyna Jańczyk-Ilach, Maria Anna Ciemerych, Edyta Brzoska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Distribution, contribution and regulation of nestinJournal of advanced research · 2024
    Review
  6. Lineage tracing reveals a novel PDGFRβScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bartosz MierzejewskiDepartment of Cytology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1 St, 02-096, Warszawa, Poland.
Iwona GrabowskaDepartment of Cytology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1 St, 02-096, Warszawa, Poland.
Daniel JackowskiDepartment of Cytology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1 St, 02-096, Warszawa, Poland.
Aliksandra IrhashavaDepartment of Cytology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1 St, 02-096, Warszawa, Poland.
Zuzanna MichalskaDepartment of Cytology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1 St, 02-096, Warszawa, Poland.
Władysława StremińskaDepartment of Cytology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1 St, 02-096, Warszawa, Poland.
Katarzyna Jańczyk-IlachDepartment of Cytology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1 St, 02-096, Warszawa, Poland.
Maria Anna CiemerychDepartment of Cytology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1 St, 02-096, Warszawa, Poland.
Edyta BrzoskaDepartment of Cytology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Miecznikowa 1 St, 02-096, Warszawa, Poland. edbrzoska@biol.uw.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-7886-0436
University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe skeletal muscle regeneration relays on the satellite cells which are stem cells located between basal lamina and plasmalemma of muscle fiber. In the injured muscles, the satellite cells become activated, start to proliferate, and then differentiate into myoblasts, which fuse to form myotubes and finally myofibers. The satellite cells play the crucial role in the regeneration; however, other cells present in the muscle could also support this process. In the present study, we focused on one population of such cells, i.e., muscle interstitial progenitor cells.

methodsWe used the CD146 marker to identify the population of mouse muscle interstitial cells. We analyzed the expression of selected markers, as well as clonogenic, myogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic potential in vitro. Simultaneously, we analyzed satellite cell-derived myoblasts and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells that allowed us to pinpoint the differences between these cell populations. Moreover, we isolated CD146+ cells and performed heterotopic transplantations to follow their in vivo differentiation.

resultsMouse muscle CD146+ interstitial progenitor cells expressed nestin and NG2 but not PAX7. These cells presented clonogenic and myogenic potential both in vitro and in vivo. CD146+ cells fused also with myoblasts in co-cultures in vitro. However, they were not able to differentiate to chondro- or adipocytes in vitro. Moreover, CD146+ cells followed myogenic differentiation in vivo after heterotopic transplantation.

conclusionMouse CD146+ cells represent the population of mouse muscle interstitial progenitors that differ from satellite cell-derived myoblasts and have clonogenic and myogenic properties.

Indexed as

CD146 AntigenMuscle DevelopmentMyoblastsSatellite Cells, Skeletal MuscleAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedMaleMiceMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalStem CellsCD146 AntigenBone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cellsCD146DifferentiationInterstitial cellsMouseNestinSatellite cellsSkeletal muscle regeneration

Identifiers

PMID32762770
PMCPMC7409690
OpenAlexW3047146087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.