Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32762739›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Impact of individual and neighborhood social capital on the physical and mental health of pregnant women: the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).

Ryoko Morozumi, Kenta Matsumura, Kei Hamazaki, Akiko Tsuchida, Ayako Takamori, Hidekuni Inadera, Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Social cohesion, social capital and mental health: current evidence and future research directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of Social Capital on Mental Health: Evidence from the China Family Panel Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryoko MorozumiFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama-shi, Toyama, 930-8555, Japan. morozumi@eco.u-toyama.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2718-6776
Kenta MatsumuraToyama Regional Center for JECS, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Kei HamazakiToyama Regional Center for JECS, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Akiko TsuchidaToyama Regional Center for JECS, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Ayako TakamoriToyama Regional Center for JECS, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Hidekuni InaderaToyama Regional Center for JECS, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) Group
University of Toyama · JP

Funding

Ministry of the Environment NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies revealed positive, negative, and no influence of social capital on the health outcomes of pregnant women. It was considered that such differences were caused by the disparities of outcome measures and sample sizes between studies. Our chief aim was to verify the positive influence of social capital on the health condition of pregnant women using established health outcome measures and large-scale nationwide survey data.

methodsWe employed questionnaire survey data from 79,210 respondents to the Japan Environment and Children's Study, and physical and mental component summary scores from the 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey as outcome measures. We estimated the effect of individual and neighborhood social capitals on physical and mental component summary scores. To consider the property that the richness of social capital would be generally determined by individual characteristics, and to estimate the causal influence of social capital on health without bias caused by said property, we adopted average treatment effect estimation with inverse probability weighting. Generally, average treatment effects are based on the difference of average outcomes between treated and untreated groups in an intervention. In this research, we reckoned individuals' different levels of social capital as a kind of non-randomized treatment for respective individuals, and we applied average treatment effect estimation. The analysis regarded pregnant women with the lowest level of social capital as untreated samples and women with other levels of social capitals as treated samples.

resultsFor mental component summary score, the maximum average treatment effects in the comparison between the lowest and highest levels of social capital were approximately 4.4 and 1.6 for individual and neighborhood social capital, respectively. The average treatment effects for the physical component summary score were negligible for both social capital types.

conclusionsSocial capital particularly contributes to improving mental component summary score in pregnant women. The likelihood of a mentally healthy pregnancy may be increased by enhancing social capital.

Indexed as

Mental HealthResidence CharacteristicsSocial CapitalWomen's HealthAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansJapanMiddle AgedPregnancyYoung AdultAverage treatment effectInverse probability weightingJapan Environment and Children’s StudyPregnant womenSF-8Social capital

Identifiers

PMID32762739
PMCPMC7409696
OpenAlexW3047514384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.