Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32762734›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2020

Feasibility study of using simultaneous multi-slice RESOLVE diffusion weighted imaging to assess parotid gland tumors: comparison with conventional RESOLVE diffusion weighted imaging.

Jia-Suo Jiang, Liu-Ning Zhu, Qian Wu, Yi Sun, Wei Liu, Xiao-Quan Xu, Fei-Yun Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Parotid Gland Tumors: Molecular Diagnostic Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jia-Suo JiangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300, Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing, China.
Liu-Ning ZhuDepartment of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Qian WuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300, Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing, China.
Yi SunMR Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Wei LiuSiemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Xiao-Quan XuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300, Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing, China. xxq_njmu@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5493-5256
Fei-Yun WuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 300, Guangzhou Rd, Nanjing, China. wfy_njmu@163.com.
Jiangsu Province Hospital · CNSiemens (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the feasibility of using simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains (RESOLVE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to assess parotid gland tumors, compared with conventional RESOLVE DWI.

methodsFrom September 2018 to December 2018, 20 consecutive patients with parotid tumors who underwent MRI scan for pre-surgery evaluation were enrolled. SMS-RESOLVE DWI and conventional RESOLVE DWI were scanned with matched imaging parameters, respectively. The scan time of two DWI sequences was recorded. Qualitative (anatomical structure differentiation, lesion display, artifact, and overall image quality) and quantitative (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC; ratio of signal-to-noise ratio, SNR ratio; ratio of contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR ratio) assessments of image quality were performed, and compared between SMS-RESOLVE DWI and conventional RESOLVE DWI by using Paired t-test. Two-sided P value less than 0.05 indicated significant difference.

resultsThe scan time was 3 min and 41 s for SMS-RESOLVE DWI, and 5 min and 46 s for conventional RESOLVE DWI. SMS-RESOLVE DWI produced similar qualitative image quality with RESOLVE DWI (anatomical structure differentiation, P = 0.164; lesion display, P = 0.193; artifact, P = 0.330; overall image quality, P = 0.083). Meanwhile, there were no significant difference on ADC

conclusionCompared with conventional RESOLVE DWI, SMS-RESOLVE DWI could provide comparable image quality using markedly reduced scan time. SMS could increase the clinical usability of RESOLVE technique for DWI of parotid gland.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEcho-Planar ImagingFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParotid NeoplasmsProspective StudiesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsDiffusion-weighted imagingMagnetic resonance imagingParotid glandReadout segmentation of long variable echo-trainsSimultaneous multi-slice

Identifiers

PMID32762734
PMCPMC7412638
OpenAlexW3047176881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.