Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32762312›Full record

ArticleGM crops & food2021

The level of Cry1Ac endotoxin and its efficacy against

Shakra Jamil, Rahil Shahzad, Sajid Ur Rahman, Muhammad Zaffar Iqbal, Muhammad Yaseen, Shakeel Ahmad, Rida Fatima

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GM crops & food, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Convergence ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shakra JamilGenetically Modified Organism Testing Lab, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute , Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7319-2977
Rahil ShahzadGenetically Modified Organism Testing Lab, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute , Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4111-5037
Sajid Ur RahmanGenetically Modified Organism Testing Lab, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute , Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Zaffar IqbalGenetically Modified Organism Testing Lab, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute , Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad YaseenDepartment of Mathematics & Statistics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad , Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Shakeel AhmadState Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, China National Rice Research Institute , Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6651-9399
Rida FatimaGenetically Modified Organism Testing Lab, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute , Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Ayub Agriculture Research Institute · PKChina National Rice Research Institute · CNUniversity of Faisalabad · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A biophysical survey was conducted in 15 cotton-growing districts of Pakistan. Four hundred cotton growers were approached and inquired about the production technology of Bt cotton. Further, 25 strip tests using combo strips (

Indexed as

MothsAnimalsBacterial ProteinsEndotoxinsGossypiumHemolysin ProteinsInsecticide ResistanceLarvaPakistanPlants, Genetically ModifiedBacterial ProteinsEndotoxinsHemolysin ProteinsCanopiescry endotoxinELISAinsect mortalityinsect resistancestrip testtransgenic cotton

Identifiers

PMID32762312
PMCPMC7553749
OpenAlexW3047962167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.