Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32762115›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020

Assessment of suitable antihypertensive therapies: Combination with high-dose amlodipine/irbesartan vs triple combination with amlodipine/irbesartan/indapamide (ASAHI-AI study).

Naoki Nakagawa, Nobuyuki Sato, Yasuaki Saijo, Hideo Morimoto, Satoshi Koyama, Yuji Ogawa, Kazumi Uekita, Junichi Maruyama, Takafumi Ohta, Yasuhiro Nakamura and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Naoki NakagawaDivision of Cardiology, Nephrology, Pulmonology and Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5398-3667
Nobuyuki SatoDivision of Cardiology, Nephrology, Pulmonology and Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Yasuaki SaijoDivision of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Department of Health Science, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Hideo MorimotoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Fukagawa Municipal Hospital, Fukagawa, Japan.
Satoshi KoyamaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Rehabilitation Hospital, Asahikawa, Japan.
Yuji OgawaDepartment of Cardiology, Asahikawa Kosei General Hospital, Asahikawa, Japan.
Kazumi UekitaDepartment of Cardiology, Hokkaido Kitami Hospital, Kitami, Japan.
Junichi MaruyamaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Rehabilitation Hospital, Asahikawa, Japan.
Takafumi OhtaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Rehabilitation Hospital, Asahikawa, Japan.
Yasuhiro NakamuraDepartment of Cardiology, Municipal Ashibetsu Hospital, Ashibetsu, Japan.
Toshiharu TakeuchiDivision of Cardiology, Nephrology, Pulmonology and Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
Naoyuki HasebeDivision of Cardiology, Nephrology, Pulmonology and Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Japan.
ASAHI-AI investigators
Asahikawa Medical University · JPAsahikawa Kosei Hospital · JPFukuyama City Hospital · JPKitami Information Technology (Japan) · JPSeisa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) plus calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are a widely used combination therapy for hypertensive patients. In order to determine which combination was better as the next-step therapy for standard-dose combination of ARBs and CCBs, a combination with high-dose CCBs or a triple combination with diuretics, the authors conducted a prospective, randomized, open-label trial to determine which of the following combination is better as the next-step treatment: a combination with high-dose CCBs or a triple combination with diuretics. Hypertensive outpatients who did not achieve their target blood pressure (BP) with usual dosages of ARBs and amlodipine 5 mg were randomly assigned to treatment with irbesartan 100 mg/amlodipine 10 mg (Group 1: n = 48) or indapamide 1 mg in addition to ARBs plus amlodipine 5 mg (Group 2: n = 46). The primary end point was changes in the systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) after the 12-week treatment period, while secondary end points were changes in BP after the 24-week treatment period and laboratory values. At 12 weeks, the SBP/DBP significantly decreased from 152.1/83.4 mm Hg to 131.5/76.1 mm Hg in Group 1 and 153.9/82.1 mm Hg to 132.7/75.9 mm Hg in Group 2. Although both groups produced a similar efficacy in reducing the SBP/DBP (-19.2/-9.2 mm Hg in Group 1 and -21.6/-8.8 mm Hg in Group 2; SBP P = .378, DBP P = .825), high-dose CCBs combined with ARBs controlled hypertension without elevation of serum uric acid. These results will provide new evidence for selecting optimal combination therapies for uncontrolled hypertensive patients.

Indexed as

HypertensionAmlodipineAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsArtificial IntelligenceBlood PressureDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansIndapamideIrbesartanProspective StudiesTetrazolesTreatment OutcomeUric AcidAmlodipineAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsIndapamideIrbesartanTetrazolesUric Acidantihypertensive agentsblood pressure variabilitycombination therapy

Identifiers

PMID32762115
PMCPMC8029846
OpenAlexW3047771922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.