ReviewJapan journal of nursing science : JJNS2020
Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness: A concept analysis.
Review in Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care.Community mental health journal · 2024Pooled it
- Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- The LIFE-ACE Framework of Building Therapeutic Relationships that Support Recovery in Japanese Community Mental Health: A Qualitative Study.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Factors in Patient-Clinician Interactions That Influence the Decision-Making Process of Older Patients with Dementia.JMA journal · 2026Article
- Interprofessional education through case conferences: Enhancing collaborative skills in psychiatric discharge planning.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Article
- Transforming Care Models in Cystic Fibrosis: A Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Barriers to and Facilitators of Shared Decision-Making Implementation in Fertility Preservation for Patients With Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2025Article
- The Clinical Handshake: Etiological Co-formulation in the Patient Encounter.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2025Article
- A Mobile App Designed to Promote Shared Decision-Making in the Treatment of Psychotic Disorders: Feasibility and Acceptability Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Shared Decision-Making in Choosing Dialysis Modalities for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Review
- The role of the ethics expert in Spanish legislation on euthanasia and mental health.Monash bioethics review · 2025Review
- Developing STEP-SE: A Qualitative Usability Study of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Managing Side Effects in Shared Decision-Making for Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Association Between Health Literacy and Understanding of Doctors' Explanations: The Yamagata Study.Health literacy research and practice · 2024Article
- Article
- A Nursing Process for Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Severe Mental Illness Receiving Treatment Involving Long-Term Coercive Measures: A Modified Grounded Theory Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Patients with severe mental illness and their carers' expectations for GPs' communication skills: a qualitative approach in Spain.BJGP open · 2024Article
- Perspectives of adult patients with mental health disorders on the relationship with nurses: a focus group study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Development and acceptability testing of a decision aid for considering whether to reduce antipsychotics in individuals with stable schizophrenia.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2023Article
- Experiencing (Shared) Decision Making: Results from a Qualitative Study of People with Mental Illness and Their Family Members.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Shared Decision-Making to Improve Health-Related Outcomes for Adults with Stroke Disease.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimShared decision making for adults with severe mental illness has increasingly attracted attention. However, this concept has not been comprehensively clarified. This review aimed to clarify a concept of shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness such as schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar disorder, and propose an adequate definition.
methodsRodgers' evolutionary concept analysis was used. MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL were searched for articles written in English and published between 2010 and November 2019. The search terms were "psychiatr*" or "mental" or "schizophren*" or "depression" or "bipolar disorder", combined with "shared decision making". In total, 70 articles met the inclusion criteria. An inductive approach was used to identify themes and sub-themes related to shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness. Surrogate terms and a definition of the concept were also described.
resultsFour key attributes were identified: user-professional relationship, communication process, user-friendly visualization, and broader stakeholder approach. Communication process was the densest attribute, which consisted of five phases: goal sharing, information sharing, deliberation, mutual agreement, and follow-up. The antecedents as prominent predisposing factors were long-term complex illness, power imbalance, global trend, users' desire, concerns, and stigma. The consequences included decision-related outcomes, users' changes, professionals' changes, and enhanced relationship.
conclusionsShared decision making for adults with severe mental illness is a communication process, involving both user-friendly visualization techniques and broader stakeholders. The process may overcome traditional power imbalance and encourage changes among both users and professionals that could enhance the dyadic relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.