ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2020
Dynamic reconfiguration of functional brain networks supporting response inhibition in a stop-signal task.
Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Frequency-band specific directed connectivity networks reveal functional disruptions and pathogenic patterns in temporal lobe epilepsy: a MEG study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploration of Key Brain Regions Involved in Acupuncture and Moxibustion Analgesia: An Imaging-Based Study.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the differential effect of reward prospect on response selection and inhibition.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Altered intrinsic brain activity in patients with CSF1R-related leukoencephalopathy.Brain imaging and behavior · 2022Article
- Temporally dynamic neural correlates of drug cue reactivity, response inhibition, and methamphetamine-related response inhibition in people with methamphetamine use disorder.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Cognitive Functioning and Schizotypy: A Four-Years Study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Response inhibition is the ability to suppress automatic actions or behaviors that are not appropriate or are no longer adaptive to the situation. Although many studies have suggested regional brain activation, the nature of the reconfiguration of functional brain networks involved in response inhibition remains unknown. Here, we assessed brain changes associated with response inhibition using graph theoretical analysis applied to functional connectivity data acquired while subjects performed a simple stop-signal task. We identified several ways in which global network organization shifted to meet the demand for response inhibition. Increased demand for response inhibition was associated with a global network configuration with more efficient communication across the network (functional integration) and more specialized processing (functional segregation). Regions distributed in the frontoparietal network and attention networks were found to be highly efficient in the stop condition. Nodal efficiency was significantly associated with reaction time and showed a different pattern between the go and stop conditions. In addition, the conditional differences (stop vs. go) in nodal efficiency and regional task activation were common in the postcentral gyrus (PoCG) and superior temporal lobe gyrus (STG), and a negative correlation between these differences was found in the frontal and parietal lobes. These results provide compelling evidence that response inhibition is associated with truly global changes in brain functional connectivity and additional insights into how defects in response inhibition are associated with neurological or psychiatric difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.