Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32761535›Full record

ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2020

Invasive mechanical ventilation using a bilevel PAP ST device in a healthy swine model.

Brian E Foster, Montserrat Diaz-Abad, Arlene J Hudson, Peter Bedocs, Darius M Doll, Steven A Lopez, John Mares, Justin Hutzler, Brian D Robertson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Brian E FosterDepartment of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. Brian.E.Foster7.mil@mail.mil.ORCID 0000-0001-9379-6682
Montserrat Diaz-AbadDepartment of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Arlene J HudsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Peter BedocsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Darius M DollDepartment of Medicine, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Steven A LopezUniversity of New Mexico Sleep Disorders Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
John MaresHenry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Rockville, MD, USA.
Justin HutzlerHenry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Rockville, MD, USA.
Brian D RobertsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. Brian.D.Robertson2.mil@mail.mil.
Henry M. Jackson Foundation · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of New Mexico · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

U.S. Department of Defense (US) SUR-90-10378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may cause an acute shortage of ventilators. Standard noninvasive bilevel positive airway pressure devices with spontaneous and timed respirations (bilevel PAP ST) could provide invasive ventilation but evidence on their effectiveness in this capacity is limited. We sought to evaluate the ability of bilevel PAP ST to effect gas exchange via invasive ventilation in a healthy swine model.

methodsTwo single limb respiratory circuits with passive filtered exhalation were constructed and evaluated. Next, two bilevel PAP ST devices, designed for sleep laboratory and home use, were tested on an intubated healthy swine model using these circuits. These devices were compared to an anesthesia ventilator.

resultsWe evaluated respiratory mechanics, minute ventilation, oxygenation, and presence of rebreathing for all of these devices. Both bilevel PAP ST devices were able to control the measured parameters. There were noted differences in performance between the two devices. Despite these differences, both devices provided effective invasive ventilation by controlling minute ventilation and providing adequate oxygenation in the animal model.

conclusionsCommercially available bilevel PAP ST can provide invasive ventilation with a single limb respiratory circuit and in-line filters to control oxygenation and ventilation without significant rebreathing in a swine model. Further study is needed to evaluate safety and efficacy in clinical disease models. In the setting of a ventilator shortage during the COVID-19 pandemic, and in other resource-constrained situations, these devices may be considered as an effective alternative means for invasive ventilation.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalAnimalsCOVID-19Positive-Pressure RespirationRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Function TestsSwineAnimalBilevel positive airway pressureContinuous positive airway pressureCoronavirusMechanicalModelsRespiratory mechanicsVentilators

Identifiers

PMID32761535
PMCPMC7406961
OpenAlexW3048015913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.