Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32761486›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular drugs and therapy2020

Fusion Imaging of X-ray and Transesophageal Echocardiography Improves the Procedure of Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Henning Ebelt, Thomas Domagala, Alexandra Offhaus, Matthias Wiora, Andreas Schwenzky, Matthias Hoyme, Jelena Anacker, Peter Röhl

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henning EbeltDepartment for Medicine II, Catholic Hospital "St. Johann Nepomuk", Haarbergstr. 72, 99097, Erfurt, Germany. henningebelt@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2465-1812
Thomas DomagalaDepartment for Medicine II, Catholic Hospital "St. Johann Nepomuk", Haarbergstr. 72, 99097, Erfurt, Germany.
Alexandra OffhausDepartment for Medicine II, Catholic Hospital "St. Johann Nepomuk", Haarbergstr. 72, 99097, Erfurt, Germany.
Matthias WioraDepartment for Medicine II, Catholic Hospital "St. Johann Nepomuk", Haarbergstr. 72, 99097, Erfurt, Germany.
Andreas SchwenzkyDepartment for Medicine II, Catholic Hospital "St. Johann Nepomuk", Haarbergstr. 72, 99097, Erfurt, Germany.
Matthias HoymeDepartment for Medicine II, Catholic Hospital "St. Johann Nepomuk", Haarbergstr. 72, 99097, Erfurt, Germany.
Jelena AnackerDepartment for Medicine II, Catholic Hospital "St. Johann Nepomuk", Haarbergstr. 72, 99097, Erfurt, Germany.
Peter RöhlDepartment for Medicine II, Catholic Hospital "St. Johann Nepomuk", Haarbergstr. 72, 99097, Erfurt, Germany.
Katholisches Krankenhaus St. Johann Nepomuk · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeft atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative treatment strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation who are at risk for thromboembolic events and considered not suitable for oral anticoagulation (OAC). LAAC is mainly performed under the guidance of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy. The study presented here should analyze whether fusion imaging (FI) of transesophageal echocardiography and X-ray performed during LAAC is feasible and can improve the results of the procedure.

methodsThe data presented here are from a retrospective single center study. Sample size was defined as 50 patients in which LAAC was performed without fusion imaging (control group) and 25 patients were the LAAC procedure was guided by fusion imaging (treatment group). Inclusion criteria were defined as age > 18 years and completion of an LAAC procedure defined as deployment of a WATCHMAN 2.5 LAA occluder. Study endpoints were procedure time, amount of used contrast medium, radiation dose, final position of the WATCHMAN in TEE (deviation from ideal positioning), and clinical endpoints, respectively.

resultsLAA closure was successfully performed in all patients. No case of device embolism was occurring, and none of the patients experienced a periprocedural stroke/TIA nor a systemic embolism, respectively. Mean procedure time was 15 min shorter in the group of patients where fusion imaging was applied (p < 0.001). Additionally, the use of fusion imaging was associated with a significant reduction of contrast medium (20.6 ml less than in control; p < 0.045). Regarding the final position of the WATCHMAN, no relevant differences were found between the groups. The use of fusion imaging significantly reduced procedure time and the amount of contrast medium in patients undergoing LAAC.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyEchocardiography, TransesophagealAction PotentialsAgedAged, 80 and overAtrial AppendageAtrial FibrillationFeasibility StudiesFemaleFluoroscopyHeart RateHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMultimodal ImagingAtrial fibrillationFusion imagingLAAC

Identifiers

PMID32761486
PMCPMC7674364
OpenAlexW3047297121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.