ReviewEuropean radiology experimental2020
Musculoskeletal MRI at 7 T: do we need more or is it more than enough?
Review in European radiology experimental, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- 7.0 Tesla MRI in fetal autopsy: a preliminary exploration of integrating image optimization with clinical practice in a multidisciplinary workflow.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- A proof-of-concept study of multitask learning for cranial synthetic CT generation across heterogeneous MRI field strengths.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Revisiting meniscal anatomical variants of the knee: a high-resolution 7-Tesla MRI study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Imaging in clinical trials of axial spondyloarthritis: what type of imaging should be used.Skeletal radiology · 2025Review
- High-Resolution 3D Turbo Spin-Echo Wrist MRI at 7T Accelerated by Compressed Sensing.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- How to Implement Clinical 7T MRI-Practical Considerations and Experience with Ultra-High-Field MRI.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Imaging in inflammatory arthritis: progress towards precision medicine.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023Review
- T2 MAPPING OF ACETABULAR CARTILAGE IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY OSTEOARTHRITIS AND DDH-INDUCED SECONDARY OSTEOARTHRITIS ANALYSED WITH 7 TESLA MICRO-MRI.Acta clinica Croatica · 2023Article
- Novel micro-MRI approach for subchondral trabecular bone analysis in patients with hip osteoarthritis is comparable to micro-CT approach.Croatian medical journal · 2022Article
- Imaging Evaluation of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration and Painful Discs-Advances and Challenges in Quantitative MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review of Quantitative Knee Articular Cartilage MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging (UHF-MRI) provides important diagnostic improvements in musculoskeletal imaging. The higher signal-to-noise ratio leads to higher spatial and temporal resolution which results in improved anatomic detail and higher diagnostic confidence. Several methods, such as T2, T2*, T1rho mapping, delayed gadolinium-enhanced, diffusion, chemical exchange saturation transfer, and magnetisation transfer techniques, permit a better tissue characterisation. Furthermore, UHF-MRI enables in vivo measurements by low-γ nuclei (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.