Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32761477›Full record

ReviewSpine deformity2020

State of the art advances in minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Ibrahim Hussain, Kai-Ming Fu, Juan S Uribe, Dean Chou, Praveen V Mummaneni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Spine deformity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pros and Cons of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ibrahim HussainDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6343-2228
Kai-Ming FuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, USA. kaf9045@med.cornell.edu.
Juan S UribeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurologic Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Dean ChouDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Praveen V MummaneniDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) can be associated with substantial suffering due to pain and disability. Surgical intervention for achieving neural decompression and restoring physiological spinal alignment has shown to result in significant improvement in pain and disability through patient-reported outcomes. Traditional open approaches involving posterior osteotomy techniques and instrumentation are effective based on clinical outcomes but associated with high complication rates, even in the hands of the most experienced surgeons. Minimally invasive techniques may offer benefit while decreasing associated morbidity. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for ASD has evolved over the past 20 years, driven by improved understanding of open procedures along with novel technique development and technologic advancements. Early efforts were hindered due to suboptimal outcomes resulting from high pseudarthrosis, inadequate correction, and fixation failure rates. To address this, multi-center collaborative groups have been established to study large numbers of ASD patients which have been vital to understanding optimal patient selection and individualized management strategies. Different MIS decision-making algorithms have been described to better define appropriate candidates and interbody selection approaches in ASD. The purpose of this state of the review is to describe the evolution of MIS surgery for adult deformity with emphasis on landmark papers, and to discuss specific MIS technology for ASD, including percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation, hyperlordotic grafts, three-dimensional navigation, and robotics.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDecision MakingHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOsteotomyPatient SelectionPedicle ScrewsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSpinal DiseasesSpinal FusionSpineSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdult spinal deformityAnterior column releaseMIISAMinimally invasiveMISDEFNavigationRobotics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.