Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32761440›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2020

'Vaccine hesitancy' among university students in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Serena Barello, Tiziana Nania, Federica Dellafiore, Guendalina Graffigna, Rosario Caruso

Open access · bronzeAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 246 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
246citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
46.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

246 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 442 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Prevalence of COVID-19 Vaccination among Medical Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

186 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Serena BarelloDepartment of Psychology, EngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food and Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Gemelli 1, 20143, Milan, Italy. serena.barello@unicatt.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8514-2563
Tiziana NaniaHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Federica DellafioreHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Guendalina GraffignaDepartment of Psychology, EngageMinds HUB - Consumer, Food and Health Engagement Research Center, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L.go Gemelli 1, 20143, Milan, Italy.
Rosario CarusoHealth Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The debate around vaccines has been in the spotlight over the last few years in Europe, both within the scientific community and the general public debate. In this regard, the case of the Italian vaccination debate is particularly worrying given that Italy has been one of the European countries with the highest number of measles cases in the recent past. According to this scenario, we conducted a cross-sectional study on a convenience sample of Italian university students aimed at: (1) exploring their attitudes towards a future vaccine to prevent COVID-19 and; (2) evaluating the impact of the university curricula (healthcare vs. non-healthcare curricula) on the intention to vaccinate. Descriptive analysis on the 735 students that answered to the question on the intention to vaccinate showed that 633 (86.1%) students reported that they would choose to have a vaccination for the COVID-19 coronavirus; on the other side, 102 (13.9%) students reported that they would not or be not sure to vaccine (low intention to vaccinate). This means that in our sample more than one student out of 10 shows low intention to vaccinate (vaccine hesitancy). Furthermore, when running analysis comparing healthcare students versus non-healthcare students we found no significant differences in responses' percentage distribution (p = .097). Understanding the student's perspective about the future COVID-19 vaccine and supporting their health engagement and consciousness may be useful in planning adequate response and multidisciplinary educational strategies-including the psychological perspective on vaccine hesitancy underlying factors - in the post-pandemic period.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIntentionItalyPandemicsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2StudentsUniversitiesCOVID-19 VaccinesViral VaccinesCOVID-19Vaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID32761440
PMCPMC7409616
OpenAlexW3047643527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.