Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32761437›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2022

Advanced CT visualization improves the accuracy of orthopaedic trauma surgeons and residents in classifying proximal humeral fractures: a feasibility study.

Jan Dauwe, Karen Mys, Guy Putzeys, Jana F Schader, R Geoff Richards, Boyko Gueorguiev, Peter Varga, Stefaan Nijs

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jan DauweAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Switzerland. dauwejan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4791-8663
Karen MysAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.
Guy PutzeysDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Jana F SchaderAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.
R Geoff RichardsAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.
Boyko GueorguievAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.
Peter VargaAO Research Institute Davos, Clavadelerstrasse 8, 7270, Davos, Switzerland.
Stefaan NijsDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
AO Foundation · CHAZ Groeninge · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOsteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures remains challenging with high reported failure rates. Understanding the fracture type is mandatory in surgical treatment to achieve an optimal anatomical reduction. Therefore, a better classification ability resulting in improved understanding of the fracture pattern is important for preoperative planning. The purpose was to investigate the feasibility and added value of advanced visualization of segmented 3D computed tomography (CT) images in fracture classification.

methodsSeventeen patients treated with either plate-screw-osteosynthesis or shoulder hemi-prosthesis between 2015 and 2019 were included. All preoperative CT scans were segmented to indicate every fracture fragment in a different color. Classification ability was tested in 21 orthopaedic residents and 12 shoulder surgeons. Both groups were asked to classify fractures using three different modalities (standard CT scan, 3D reconstruction model, and 3D segmented model) into three different classification systems (Neer, AO/OTA and LEGO).

resultsAll participants were able to classify the fractures more accurately into all three classification systems after evaluating the segmented three-dimensional (3D) models compared to both 2D slice-wise evaluation and 3D reconstruction model. This finding was significant (p < 0.005) with an average success rate of 94%. The participants experienced significantly more difficulties classifying fractures according to the LEGO system than the other two classifications.

conclusionSegmentation of CT scans added value to the proximal humeral fracture classification, since orthopaedic surgeons were able to classify fractures significantly better into the AO/OTA, Neer, and LEGO classification systems compared to both standard 2D slice-wise evaluation and 3D reconstruction model.

Indexed as

OrthopedicsOrthopedic SurgeonsShoulder FracturesFeasibility StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyComputer-assisted segmentationFracture classificationProximal humeral fractureSemi-automatic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID32761437
OpenAlexW3046958102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.