Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32761394›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2020

[

Marco Aiello, Vincenzo Alfano, Elena Salvatore, Carlo Cavaliere, Marco Picardi, Roberta Della Pepa, Emanuele Nicolai, Andrea Soricelli, Alessandra Vella, Marco Salvatore and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Spinal cord FDG PET uptake in healthy adults: an AI-driven segmentation study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Quantification of FDG in the spinal cord using PET/MRI.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco AielloIRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo AlfanoIRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy. vincenzo.alfano@synlab.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5869-754X
Elena SalvatoreDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Carlo CavaliereIRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy.
Marco PicardiDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Section, I, Naples, Italy.
Roberta Della PepaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Hematology Section, I, Naples, Italy.
Emanuele NicolaiIRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy.
Andrea SoricelliIRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy.
Alessandra VellaNuclear Medicine, «Le Scotte» Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Marco SalvatoreIRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy.
Mario Mascalchi«Mario Serio» Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
SDN Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare · ITOspedale Santa Maria alle Scotte · ITSynlab Czech (Czechia) · CZUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lack of visualization of the spinal cord hinders the evaluation of [

methodsForty-one patients with lymphoma without clinical or MRI signs of spinal cord or bone marrow involvement underwent simultaneous PET and MRI acquisition using Siemens Biograph mMR after injection of 3.5 MBq/kg body weight of [

resultsOn PET/MRI using the 3 mm ROI, the following average (all level excluding L3) spinal cord median (1st and 3rd quartile) values were measured: SUVmean, 1.68 (1.39 and 1.83); SUVmax, 1.92 (1.60 and 2.14); NSUVmean, 1.18 (0.93 and 1.36); and NSUVmax, 1.27 (1.01 and 1.33). Using the 9 mm ROI, the corresponding values were SUVmean, 1.41 (1.25-1.55); SUVmax, 2.41 (2.08 and 2.61); NSUVmean, 0.93 (0.79 and 1.04); and NSUVmax, 1.28 (1.02 and 1.39). Using the 3 mm ROI, the highest values of PET-MRI SUVmax, SUVmean, NSUVmax, and NSUVmean were consistently observed at C5 and the lowest at T6. Using a 9 mm ROI, the highest values were consistently observed at C5 and the lowest at T12 or T6. The spinal cord [

conclusionsUsing a whole-body protocol, we defined the maximum and mean [

Indexed as

FDGPET/MRISpinal cordSUV

Identifiers

PMID32761394
PMCPMC7410944
OpenAlexW3047137680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.