Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32761351›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2020

COVID-19 and the ethics of quarantine: a lesson from the Eyam plague.

Giovanni Spitale

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From polarity to plurality: Perceptions of COVID-19 and policy measures in England and Scotland.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  2. A reflection on health and disease amid COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Risk Attitude in Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Compromise Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Giovanni SpitaleInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland. giovanni.spitale@ibme.uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6812-0979

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31CA30_195905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is posing many different challenges to local communities, directly affected by the pandemic, and to the global community, trying to find how to respond to this threat in a larger scale. The history of the Eyam Plague, read in light of Ross Upshur's Four Principles for the Justification of Public Health Intervention, and of the Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, could provide useful guidance in navigating the complex ethical issues that arise when quarantine measures need to be put in place.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19EnglandHistory, 17th CenturyHumansInfection ControlLondonPandemicsPlaguePneumonia, ViralPublic HealthQuarantineCOVID-19EyamHistory of epidemiologyHistory of medicinePlaguePublic health ethicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32761351
PMCPMC7405927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.