ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020
Compliance with surgical prophylaxis guidelines in liver and kidney transplantations.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Six Long-Standing Questions about Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Surgery.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Patients undergoing solid organ transplantations are at a high risk of surgical site infections. Complying with surgical prophylaxis guidelines minimize post-operative infection rate. Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the compliance with the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists surgical prophylaxis guidelines related to antibiotic selection, dosing, administration time, and duration of surgical prophylaxis in liver and kidney transplantations. However, the re-dosing time was only assessed for liver transplantation cases. Setting The study was conducted at the solid organ transplantation center at King Abdualziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Method A retrospective chart review including all patients who had a liver or kidney transplantation from January 2016 to December 2018. Main outcome measure The compliance rate with the surgical prophylaxis guideline related to selecting the recommended antibiotic, dosing, administration time, and antibiotic exposure duration. The re-dosing time was assessed in liver transplantations. Results The study included 54 liver recipients and 163 kidney recipients, with an average age of 56 and 43 years, respectively. The majority of the included patients (68% and 56%) were male in both groups. The compliance rates to the recommendations in liver and kidney operations were 82.6% and 77.09% in terms of the choice of antibiotic, 44.5% and 13.4% in terms of dosing, 31.5% and 43.5% in terms of timing, and 18.47% and 84.36% in terms of duration, respectively. None of liver recipients received a re-dosed antibiotic at the recommended time. Conclusion The study concluded that there was an optimal compliance rate to the choice of antibiotic recommendations in both liver and kidney transplantations. Similarly, a high compliance rate was observed for the duration of antibiotic exposure after kidney transplantations. However, the compliance rate in terms of dosing and administration time was low in both transplantations. Low compliance rates were also observed in the duration of antibiotic exposure and the re-dosing time recommendations in liver transplants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.