ArticleJAMA pediatrics2020
Trends in Use of Advanced Imaging in Pediatric Emergency Departments, 2009-2018.
Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- The new 15-month pathway for pediatric radiology subspecialty in diagnostic radiology residency: opportunities, challenges, and future considerations.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Challenges of after-hours pediatric imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Trends in out-of-hospital healthcare use and costs in adolescents with complex conditions transitioning from pediatric care.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Frequency, cost, and variation in inpatient diagnostic imaging use in children's hospitals.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Article
- Current State and Future Directions of Diagnostic Imaging and Interpretation in Pediatric Radiology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pediatric Trauma in the Emergency Department: Clinical Risk Stratification, CT Utilization and Radiation Burden in a Tertiary Care Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Lack of children in public medical imaging data points to growing age bias in biomedical AI.Research square · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Large Language Models in Detecting Cases Requiring Immediate Reporting in Pediatric Radiology: A Feasibility Study Using Publicly Available Clinical Vignettes.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Quantifying and Contextualizing Radiation Doses in Common Pediatric Medical Imaging Examinations.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Who Is Diagnosing Pediatric Thyroid Nodules? A Tertiary Children's Hospital Review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Lack of children in public medical imaging data points to growing age bias in biomedical AI.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Rapid abdominopelvic MR imaging in the emergency department: establishing a program and addressing the challenges.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Automatic segmentation and quantitative analysis of brain CT volume in 2-year-olds using deep learning model.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Error Rates in Race and Ethnicity Designation Across Large Pediatric Health Systems.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Special Issue: Advanced Research in Pediatric Radiology and Nuclear Medicine.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Risk of hematological malignancies from CT radiation exposure in children, adolescents and young adults.Nature medicine · 2023Article
- Advanced Neuromonitoring Modalities on the Horizon: Detection and Management of Acute Brain Injury in Children.Neurocritical care · 2023Review
- A Scoping Review of Magnetic Resonance Modalities Used in Detection of Persistent Postconcussion Symptoms in Pediatric Populations.Journal of child neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byBeyond the2021
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: There is increased awareness of radiation risks from computed tomography (CT) in pediatric patients. In emergency departments (EDs), evidence-based guidelines, improvements in imaging technology, and availability of nonradiating modalities have potentially reduced CT use. Objective: To evaluate changes over time and hospital variation in advanced imaging use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study assessed 26 082 062 ED visits by children younger than 18 years from the Pediatric Health Information System administrative database from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2018. Exposures: Imaging. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in CT, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) rates from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2018. Imaging for specific diagnoses was examined using all patient-refined diagnosis related groups. Secondary outcomes were hospital admission and 3-day ED revisit rates and ED length of stay. Results: There were a total of 26 082 062 visits by 9 868 406 children (mean [SD] age, 5.59 [5.15] years; 13 842 567 [53.1%] male; 9 273 181 [35.6%] non-Hispanic white) to 32 US pediatric EDs during the 10-year study period, with 1 or more advanced imaging studies used in 1 919 283 encounters (7.4%). The proportion of ED encounters with any advanced imaging increased from 6.4% (95% CI, 6.2%-6.2%) in 2009 to 8.7% (95% CI, 8.7%-8.8%) in 2018. The proportion of ED encounters with CT decreased from 3.9% (95% CI, 3.9%-3.9%) to 2.9% (95% CI, 2.9%-3.0%) (P < .001 for trend), with ultrasonography increased from 2.5% (95% CI, 2.5%-2.6%) to 5.8% (95% CI, 5.8%-5.9%) (P < .001 for trend), and with MRI increased from 0.3% (95% CI, 0.3%-0.4%) to 0.6% (95% CI, 0.6%-0.6%) (P < .001 for trend). The largest decreases in CT rates were for concussion (-23.0%), appendectomy (-14.9%), ventricular shunt procedures (-13.3%), and headaches (-12.4%). Factors associated with increased use of nonradiating imaging modalities included ultrasonography for abdominal pain (20.3%) and appendectomy (42.5%) and MRI for ventricular shunt procedures (17.9%) (P < .001 for trend). Across the study period, EDs varied widely in the use of ultrasonography for appendectomy (median, 57.5%; interquartile range [IQR], 40.4%-69.8%) and MRI (median, 15.8%; IQR, 8.3%-35.1%) and CT (median, 69.5%; IQR, 54.5%-76.4%) for ventricular shunt procedures. Overall, ED length of stay did not change, and hospitalization and 3-day ED revisit rates decreased during the study period. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that use of advanced imaging increased from 2009 to 2018. Although CT use decreased, this decrease was accompanied by a greater increase in the use of ultrasonography and MRI. There appears to be substantial variation in practice and a need to standardize imaging practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.