Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32761086›Full record

ReviewEndocrinology2020

Sexual Differentiation and Substance Use: A Mini-Review.

Samuel J Harp, Mariangela Martini, Wendy J Lynch, Emilie F Rissman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Neuroscience in addiction research.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Neurosteroids and the mesocorticolimbic system.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Perinatal activation of ERJournal of neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel J HarpCenter for Human Health and the Environment and Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Mariangela MartiniCenter for Human Health and the Environment and Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Wendy J LynchDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Emilie F RissmanCenter for Human Health and the Environment and Program in Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES025128 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Sue Fenton · 2015 to 2026
$18.3M
Dopaminergic and Glutamatergic Mechanisms of Cocaine Addiction: Sex DifferencesR01DA024716 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Wendy Jean Lynch · 2008 to 2026
$6.1M
Genetic and hormonal contributions to sex differences in vulnerability to drug useR01DA048638 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LYNCH, WENDY JEAN, RISSMAN, EMILIE F. · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Exercise as a Sex-Specific Intervention Strategy for Cocaine AddictionR01DA039093 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LYNCH, WENDY JEAN · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
A Novel Nutrition-Based Anti-Relapse Intervention for Cocaine AddictionR21DA047856 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LYNCH, WENDY JEAN · 2019 to 2020
$444k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024716NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039093NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048638NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA047856NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES025128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The organizational/activational hypothesis suggests that gonadal steroid hormones like testosterone (T) and estradiol (E2) are important at 2 different times during the lifespan when they perform 2 different functions. First steroids "organize" brain structures early in life and during puberty, and in adults these same hormones "activate" sexually dimorphic behaviors. This hypothesis has been tested and proven valid for a large number of behaviors (learning, memory, social, and sexual behaviors). Sex differences in drug addiction are well established both for humans and animal models. Previous research in this field has focused primarily on cocaine self-administration by rats. Traditionally, observed sex differences have been explained by the sex-specific concentrations of gonadal hormones present at the time of the drug-related behavior. Studies with gonadectomized rodents establishes an activational role for E2 that facilitates vulnerability in females, and when E2 is combined with progesterone, addiction is attenuated. Literature on organizational actions of steroids is sparse but predicts that T, after it is aromatized to E2, changes aspects of the neural reward system. Here we summarize these data and propose that sex chromosome complement also plays a role in determining sex-specific drug-taking behavior. Future research is needed to disentangle the effects of hormones and sex chromosome complement, and we propose the four core genotype mouse model as an effective tool for answering these questions.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsBrainGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansRewardRisk FactorsSex CharacteristicsSex DifferentiationSex FactorsSubstance-Related DisordersGonadal Steroid Hormonescocainedopamineestrogenmicesex chromosomessexual differentiation

Identifiers

PMID32761086
PMCPMC7438703
OpenAlexW3048174025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.