Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32760982›Full record

ArticleThe Analyst2020

Assessment of human plasma and urine sample preparation for reproducible and high-throughput UHPLC-MS clinical metabolic phenotyping.

Andrew D Southam, Liam D Haglington, Lukáš Najdekr, Andris Jankevics, Ralf J M Weber, Warwick B Dunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analyst, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A rapid single-phase extraction for polar staphylococcal lipids.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew D SouthamSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. a.d.southam@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-7663
Liam D HaglingtonSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. a.d.southam@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7527-7157
Lukáš NajdekrSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. a.d.southam@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9559-5454
Andris JankevicsSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. a.d.southam@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2095-6846
Ralf J M WeberSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. a.d.southam@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8796-4771
Warwick B DunnSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. a.d.southam@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6924-0027

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M009157/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical metabolic phenotyping employs metabolomics and lipidomics to detect and measure hundreds to thousands of metabolites and lipids within human samples. This approach aims to identify metabolite and lipid changes between phenotypes (e.g. disease status) that aid understanding of biochemical mechanisms driving the phenotype. Sample preparation is a critical step in clinical metabolic phenotyping: it must be reproducible and give a high extraction yield of metabolites and lipids, and in high-throughput studies it needs to be rapid. Here, we assessed the extraction of polar metabolites from human urine and polar metabolites and lipids from human plasma for analysis by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS) metabolomics and lipidomics. We evaluated several monophasic (urine and plasma) and biphasic (plasma) extractions, and we also tested alterations to (a) solvent-biofluid incubation time and temperature during monophasic extraction, and (b) phase partitioning time during biphasic extraction. Extracts were analysed by three UHPLC-MS assays: (i) hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) for urine and plasma, (ii) C

Indexed as

MetabolomicsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansMass SpectrometryReproducibility of ResultsSolventsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID32760982
PMCPMC13444864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.