Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32760898›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2020

A comparison of application frequency of physical therapy modalities in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain.

Turgay Altınbilek, Sadiye Murat

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06461494 (Comparative Effect of Egoscue Versus Pilates Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion, Flexibility and Muscles Endurance in Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06461494 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effect of Egoscue Versus Pilates Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion, Flexibility and Muscles Endurance in Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled34ConditionsLow Back PainArmsbaseline treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Turgay AltınbilekSpecialist of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Private Office, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sadiye MuratDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul Medeniyet University Göztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Turkish Society of Hematology · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the effects of physical therapy modalities five days a week versus twice a week with a three-day interval on pain, depression, and functional disability in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain. PATIENTS AND

methodsBetween June 2018 and November 2018, a total of 60 patients (39 females, 21 males; mean age 41.0±6.8 years; range, 25 to 55 years) with chronic mechanical low back pain were included. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=30) received physical therapy five days a week for a total of 15 sessions, while Group 2 (n=30) received physical therapy twice a week with a three-day interval for a total of six sessions. Per protocol, all patients were applied hot pack for 20 min, followed by conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 min and therapeutic ultrasound (US) for 10 min in each session. All patients were given exercise training and were instructed to do twice a day up to four weeks after the completion of physical therapy sessions. The severity of low back pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), the severity of depression using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and functional disability using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). All patients were evaluated before and after physical therapy and at four weeks. The results were compared between the groups.

resultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the age, gender, body mass index, occupation, VAS, BDI, and ODI scores at the time of randomization (p>0.05). Intra-group analysis showed a significant improvement in all parameters after physical therapy compared to pre-treatment values and at four weeks compared to the post-treatment values (p<0.001). The differences of changes were used for the inter- group analysis which revealed a difference of change in favor of improvement was significantly higher in Group 2 than Group 1 (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the post-treatment values and values at four weeks (p>0.05).

conclusionOur study results suggest that both physical therapy modalities applied five days week and twice a week are effective in pain, depression, and functional disability. However, physical therapy protocol applied twice a week yields more improvement, indicating that it is more advantageous with less cost and lost workdays.

Indexed as

Chronic mechanical low back painphysical therapytreatment duration

Identifiers

PMID32760898
PMCPMC7401673
OpenAlexW3034396902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.