Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32760879›Full record

ArticleBMC rheumatology2020

Room for improvement in non-pharmacological systemic sclerosis care? - a cross-sectional online survey of 650 patients.

Juliane K Stöcker, Madelon C Vonk, Frank H J van den Hoogen, Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Julia Spierings, J Bart Staal, Ton Satink, Cornelia H M van den Ende, ARCH study group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juliane K StöckerDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3852-1157
Madelon C VonkDepartment of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Frank H J van den HoogenDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maria W G Nijhuis-van der SandenRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Julia SpieringsDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Bart StaalMusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Group, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ton SatinkResearch Group Neuro Rehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cornelia H M van den EndeDepartment of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
ARCH study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveTo gain insight in the use of current systemic sclerosis (SSc) care provided by health professionals from the patient perspective. We focused on referral reasons, treatment goals, the alignment with unmet care needs, and outcome satisfaction.

methodsDutch SSc patients from 13 participating rheumatology departments were invited to complete an online survey. Descriptive statistics were used to describe current use of non-pharmacological care and outcome satisfaction. Reasons for referral and treatment goals were encoded in International Classification of Function and Disability (ICF) terms.

resultsWe included 650 patients (mean (standard deviation [SD]) age, 59.4 (11.4) years. 50% had contact with a health professional in the past year; 76.3% since disease onset. Physiotherapists were the most frequently visited in the past year (40.0%), followed by dental hygienists (11.4%) and podiatrists (9.2%). The three most common referral reasons were pain, joint mobility and cardiovascular functions. Fatigue, Raynaud's phenomenon, physical limitations, reduced hand function and joint problems were mentioned by more than 25% of all respondents as unmet needs. The proportion of patients treated in the past year by a health professional who were satisfied with knowledge and expertise of their health professionals was 74.4%; 73% reported improved daily activities and better coping with complaints. However, 48.9% perceived that the collaboration between rheumatologist and health professional was never or only sometimes sufficient.

conclusionDespite the high outcome satisfaction and good accessibility of health professionals, there are obstacles in the access to non-pharmacological care and communication barriers between health professionals and rheumatologists.

Indexed as

Cross sectional surveyHealth care useHealth professionalsSystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID32760879
PMCPMC7393838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.