Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32760838›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2020

Improper disposal practice of unused and expired pharmaceutical products in Indonesian households.

Widya N Insani, Nabilla A Qonita, Siti S Jannah, Nisa M Nuraliyah, Woro Supadmi, Vesara A Gatera, Sofa D Alfian, Rizky Abdulah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Knowledge and Practices on Household Disposal of Unused Antimicrobials in Ho Municipality, Ghana.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Widya N InsaniDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.
Nabilla A QonitaDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.
Siti S JannahDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.
Nisa M NuraliyahDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.
Woro SupadmiDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.
Vesara A GateraDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.
Sofa D AlfianDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.
Rizky AbdulahDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproperly disposed medicines could adversely affect the environment and increase the risk of drug misuse or accidental poisoning.

objectiveTo evaluate the disposal practices of unused and expired medicines among the general population in Bandung, Indonesia.

methodThis was a descriptive cross-sectional survey conducted among 497 respondents in Bandung, Indonesia. Data were collected through interviews using a prevalidated structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were calculated using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23. Ethics approval was obtained.

main outcome measureGeneral public knowledge and attitude regarding unused and expired medication disposal practice.

resultsApproximately 95% of the respondents had unused medicines stored in their homes, with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), vitamins/nutritional supplements, and antibiotics were the most common types of medicines left unused. The majority of the respondents checked the expiration date of the drugs before purchasing (72.8%). The most common disposal method of unwanted medicines was throwing away in household garbage (82.1%). A significant percentage of them never received information about proper medication disposal practice (79.5%). Furthermore, more than half of the respondents were unaware that unsafe medication disposal practices could harm the environment and population health (53.1%).

conclusionDisposal of unwanted pharmaceutical products through environmentally unsafe route was prevalent among the respondents. There is also a lack of awareness of the impact of improperly disposed of medicines for the ecosystem. These findings call upon the strategies to strengthen the pharmaceutical waste management program.

Indexed as

Environmental hazardEnvironmental healthExpiredMedication disposalPharmaceuticalsPublic healthUnused

Identifiers

PMID32760838
PMCPMC7393449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.