ArticleReproductive biomedicine & society online2020
Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology.
Article in Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Making and disposing of life's 'starting materials': A focus group study of attitudes concerning reproductive scarcity and abundance in in vitro gametogenesis.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Article
- Fertility preferences adjusted: reimagining parenthood in response to the uncertainty of infertility.Genus · 2025Article
- Reproductive capital: theoretical foundations and empirical evidence from the workplace.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Article
- Mapping Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) of gamete donation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Parental sociodemographics of medically assisted reproduction births in the United States: a dyadic population-level study.F&S reports · 2023Article
- Residential proximity to a fertility clinic is independently associated with likelihood of women having ART and IUI treatment.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Primary ovarian insufficiency: a glimpse into the racial and socioeconomic disparities found within third-party reproduction.F&S reports · 2022Article
- Factors associated with disparate outcomes among Black women undergoing in vitro fertilization.F&S reports · 2022Article
- Disrupting the biological clock: Fertility benefits, egg freezing and proactive fertility management.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2022Article
- At risk of reproductive disadvantage? Exploring fertility awareness among migrant women in Germany.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2022Article
- Reprotech in France and the United States: Differences and similarities - An introduction.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2020Article
- Comparison of Obstetric Outcomes Between IVF cycles with Donor Oocyte and Spontaneous Conception Pregnancies: A Retrospective Cohort study.Journal of reproduction & infertilityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Louise Brown, the world's first test-tube baby, was born more than 40 years ago in England. For Louise Brown's infertile mother, Lesley, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was the 'hope technology' which allowed her to overcome her tubal infertility after 9 years of heart-breaking involuntary childlessness. Since then, IVF has travelled to diverse global locations, where millions of individuals and couples have embarked on technologically assisted 'quests for conception'. After 40 years of IVF, where has the quest for conception taken us? This article outlines seven major global trajectories - namely, that the quest for conception has become more: (i) technological, because of a profusion of IVF-based innovations; (ii) masculine, because of men's eager uptake of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, their own 'masculine hope technology'; (iii) stratified, due to persistent race- and class-based barriers in IVF access; (iv) transnational, as infertile and other involuntarily childless people search across borders to overcome restrictions in their home countries; (v) selective, as IVF-based reprogenetic technologies eliminate genetic disease while exacerbating sex selection; (vi) moral, as religious sensibilities both accommodate and curtail the possibilities and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART); and (vii) extended, as new cryopreservation technologies prolong the reproductive lifespan and extend reproduction to the transgender community. The article concludes with thoughts on where future quests for conception might take us, and why IVF and other reproductive technologies are 'good to think with' in both the anthropology and sociology of reproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.